Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cooperative Allosteric Transitions01:58

Cooperative Allosteric Transitions

8.7K
Cooperative allosteric transitions can occur in multimeric proteins, where each subunit of the protein has its own ligand-binding site. When a ligand binds to any of these subunits, it triggers a conformational change that affects the binding sites in the other subunits; this can change the affinity of the other sites for their respective ligands. The ability of the protein to change the shape of its binding site is attributed to the presence of a mix of flexible and stable segments in the...
8.7K
Cooperative Allosteric Transitions01:58

Cooperative Allosteric Transitions

3.0K
3.0K
Cooperative Allosteric Transitions01:58

Cooperative Allosteric Transitions

2.6K
2.6K
Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators02:13

Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators

7.2K
Transcriptional regulators bind to specific cis-regulatory sequences in the DNA to regulate gene transcription. These cis-regulatory sequences are very short, usually less than ten nucleotide pairs in length. The short length means that there is a high probability of the exact same sequence randomly occurring throughout the genome.  Since regulators can also bind to groups of similar sequences, this further increases the chances of random binding. Transcriptional regulators form...
7.2K
Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators02:13

Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators

2.5K
2.5K
The Evidence for Evolution02:55

The Evidence for Evolution

47.7K
Genetic variations accumulating within populations over generations give rise to biological evolution. Evolutionary changes can result in the formation of novel varieties and entire new species. These changes are responsible for the diverse forms of life inhabiting the planet. The evidence for evolution suggests that all living organisms descended from common ancestors.
47.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Temporality modulates the effect of network heterogeneity on cooperation fixation.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Strategy evolution on temporal hypergraphs.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Catalysts and inhibitors of critical transitions in ecological systems.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Coordination of network heterogeneity and individual preferences promotes collective fairness.

Patterns (New York, N.Y.)·2025
Same author

Frequency-dependent photic modulation of wakeful consolidation in visual learning.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Promoting collective cooperation through temporal interactions.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 26, 2026

Daily Transfers, Archiving Populations, and Measuring Fitness in the Long-Term Evolution Experiment with Escherichia coli
15:00

Daily Transfers, Archiving Populations, and Measuring Fitness in the Long-Term Evolution Experiment with Escherichia coli

Published on: August 18, 2023

4.3K

Spatial reciprocity in the evolution of cooperation.

Qi Su1,2, Aming Li1,3,4, Long Wang1

  • 11 Center for Systems and Control, College of Engineering, Peking University , Beijing 100871 , People's Republic of China.

Proceedings. Biological Sciences
|April 4, 2019
PubMed
Summary

Spatial structure significantly impacts cooperation evolution. Cooperation thrives when interaction partners are also role models, promoting spatial reciprocity. Asymmetric structures can enhance cooperation in biological systems.

Keywords:
assortmentevolution of cooperationevolutionary game theorypopulation structurespatial reciprocity

More Related Videos

Molecular Evolution of the Tre Recombinase
12:02

Molecular Evolution of the Tre Recombinase

Published on: May 29, 2008

10.1K
Author Spotlight: Understanding Microbe Adaptation Using Innovative Techniques for Exploring Thermophilic Evolution
08:11

Author Spotlight: Understanding Microbe Adaptation Using Innovative Techniques for Exploring Thermophilic Evolution

Published on: June 14, 2024

1.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 26, 2026

Daily Transfers, Archiving Populations, and Measuring Fitness in the Long-Term Evolution Experiment with Escherichia coli
15:00

Daily Transfers, Archiving Populations, and Measuring Fitness in the Long-Term Evolution Experiment with Escherichia coli

Published on: August 18, 2023

4.3K
Molecular Evolution of the Tre Recombinase
12:02

Molecular Evolution of the Tre Recombinase

Published on: May 29, 2008

10.1K
Author Spotlight: Understanding Microbe Adaptation Using Innovative Techniques for Exploring Thermophilic Evolution
08:11

Author Spotlight: Understanding Microbe Adaptation Using Innovative Techniques for Exploring Thermophilic Evolution

Published on: June 14, 2024

1.4K

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary Biology
  • Game Theory
  • Spatial Ecology

Background:

  • Cooperation is essential for biological systems.
  • Spatial structure influences interactions and trait acquisition.
  • Predicting cooperation evolution under spatial constraints is challenging.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop an analytical formula predicting when natural selection favors cooperation based on spatial structure.
  • To quantify the effect of spatial structure on cooperation using a single parameter.
  • To understand the conditions under which spatial structure promotes or inhibits cooperation.

Main Methods:

  • Analytical modeling to derive a formula for cooperation evolution.
  • Analysis of the relationship between interaction partners and role models in spatial structures.
  • Examination of the impact of interaction frequency with role models.

Main Results:

  • A spatial structure promotes cooperation (spatial reciprocity) when interaction partners overlap with role models.
  • Spatial structure inhibits cooperation if interaction partners do not overlap with role models, even without inherent cooperation dilemmas.
  • Increased interaction frequency between individuals and their role models strengthens reciprocity.

Conclusions:

  • Spatial structure is a critical factor in the evolution of cooperation.
  • Overlapping interaction partners and role models is key for spatial reciprocity.
  • Asymmetric spatial structures and imitation of frequently interacting individuals can facilitate cooperation.