Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 26, 2026

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Assessment of Carcinogen-induced Murine Bladder Tumors
Published on: March 29, 2019
Differentiating atypical lipomatous tumors from lipomas with magnetic resonance imaging: a comparison with MDM2 gene
Carolin Knebel1, Jan Neumann2, Benedikt J Schwaiger2
1Department of Orthopedics and Sports Orthopedics, Technical University of Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675, Munich, Germany. carolin.knebel@tum.de.
Background:
To evaluate the diagnostic value of MR imaging for the differentiation of lipomas and atypical lipomatous tumors (ALT) in comparison with histology and MDM2 amplification status.
Methods:
Patients with well-differentiated lipomatous tumors (n = 113), of which 66 were diagnosed as lipoma (mean age 53 years (range, 13-82); 47% women) and 47 as atypical lipomatous tumor (ALT; mean age 60 years (range, 28-88); 64% women), were included into this study using histology and MDM2 amplification status by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) as standard of reference. Preoperative MR images were retrospectively assessed by two radiologists for the following imaging features: maximum tumor diameter (mm) as well as the affected compartment (intramuscular, intermuscular or subcutaneous), septa (absent, thin (< 2 mm) or thick septa (> 2 mm) with nodular components); contrast enhancing areas within the lipomatous tumor (< 1/3 of the tumor volume, > 1/3 of the tumor volume); RESULTS: Of the 47 patients with ALT, 40 (85.1%) presented thick septa (> 2 mm) and this finding significantly increased the likelihood of ALT (OR 6.24, 95% CI 3.36-11.59; P < 0.001). The likelihood of ALT was increased if the tumor exceeded a maximum diameter of 130.0 mm (OR 2.74, 95% CI 1.82-4.11, P < 0.001). The presence of contrast enhancement in lipomatous tumors significantly increased the likelihood of ALT (Odds ratio (OR) 2.95, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.01-4.31; P < 0.001). Of the lipomas, 21.1% were located subcutaneously, 63.6% intramuscularly and 15.2% intermuscularly. On the other hand, none of the ALTs were located subcutaneously, the majority was located intermuscularly (87.3%) and a small number of ALTs was located intramuscularly (12.7%).
Conclusions:
Our results suggest that using specific morphological MR imaging characteristics (maximum tumor diameter, thick septa and contrast enhancement) and the information on the localization of the lipomatous tumor, a high sensitivity and substantial specificity can be achieved for the diagnosis of lipomas and ALTs.
Related Concept Videos
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Imaging Studies IV: Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Atomic Nuclei: Magnetic Resonance
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR): Overview
NMR spectroscopy generates a spectrum where the characteristic absorption frequencies of the sample are...
Antipsychotic Drugs: Typical and Atypical Agents
Cancer-Critical Genes II: Tumor Suppressor Genes
When the function of certain critical genes, especially those involved in cell cycle regulation and cell growth signaling cascades, gets disrupted, it upsets the cell cycle progression. Such cells with unchecked cell cycles start proliferating uncontrollably and eventually develop into tumors.
Such genes that act...

