Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 26, 2026

Assessment of Vascular Function in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease
Published on: June 16, 2014
B-type natriuretic peptide trumps other prognostic markers in patients assessed for coronary disease
Dipak Kotecha1,2, Marcus D Flather3, Dan Atar4
1Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK. d.kotecha@bham.ac.uk.
Insights
B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) effectively predicts outcomes in patients with suspected coronary artery disease, outperforming other markers. Elevated BNP levels identify individuals who may benefit from intensified management strategies.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiovascular Disease Research
- Medical Diagnostics
Background:
- Risk prediction in coronary artery disease (CAD) is challenging due to prior cardiovascular disease and risk modification.
- Numerous prognostic markers exist, but real-world evidence for their clinical utility is limited.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the predictive value of various markers, including B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), for outcomes in patients undergoing coronary angiography.
- To assess the independent prognostic capability of BNP compared to conventional risk factors and other novel markers.
Main Methods:
- Prospective, multicentre observational study of 522 patients referred for elective coronary angiography.
- Clinicians were blinded to risk assessments including conventional factors, pulse wave analysis, heart rate variability, hs-CRP, and BNP.
- Outcomes (all-cause mortality, composite of death, MI, or stroke) were adjudicated and analyzed using Cox regression over a median 5.0-year follow-up.
Main Results:
- Only age and BNP were independently associated with outcomes in multivariate analysis.
- Increased BNP levels significantly predicted mortality (HR 2.15) and composite events (HR 1.27).
- BNP improved outcome classification and discrimination, irrespective of left ventricular systolic function; hs-CRP, pulse wave analysis, and heart rate variability did not.
Conclusions:
- Conventional risk factors and markers of arterial compliance, inflammation, and autonomic function have limited prognostic value in risk-modified CAD patients.
- BNP independently identifies patients with subtle cardiac dysfunction who may benefit from more intensive management.
Background:
Risk prediction for patients with suspected coronary artery disease is complex due to the common occurrence of prior cardiovascular disease and extensive risk modification in primary care. Numerous markers have the potential to predict prognosis and guide management, but we currently lack robust 'real-world' evidence for their use.
Methods:
Prospective, multicentre observational study of consecutive patients referred for elective coronary angiography. Clinicians were blinded to all risk assessments, consisting of conventional factors, radial artery pulse wave analysis, 5-minute heart rate variability, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP). Blinded, independent adjudication was performed for all-cause mortality and the composite of death, myocardial infarction or stroke, analysed with Cox proportional hazards regression.
Results:
Five hundred twenty-two patients were assessed with median age 66 years and 21% prior revascularization. Median baseline left ventricular ejection fraction was 64%, and 62% had ≥ 50% stenosis on angiography. During 5.0 years median follow-up, 30% underwent percutaneous and 16% surgical revascularization. In multivariate analysis, only age and BNP were independently associated with outcomes. The adjusted hazard ratio per log unit increase in BNP was 2.15 for mortality (95% CI 1.45-3.19; p = 0.0001) and 1.27 for composite events (1.04-1.54; p = 0.018). Patients with baseline BNP > 100 pg/mL had substantially higher mortality and composite events (20.9% and 32.2%) than those with BNP ≤ 100 pg/mL (5.6% and 15.5%). BNP improved both classification and discrimination of outcomes (p ≤ 0.003), regardless of left ventricular systolic function. Conversely, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, pulse wave analysis and heart rate variability were unrelated to prognosis at 5 years after risk modification and treatment of coronary disease.
Conclusions:
Conventional risk factors and other markers of arterial compliance, inflammation and autonomic function have limited value for prediction of outcomes in risk-modified patients assessed for coronary disease. BNP can independently identify patients with subtle impairment of cardiac function that might benefit from more intensive management.
Trial Registration:
Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00403351 Registered on 22 November 2006.
More Related Videos
05:16Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
Published on: June 10, 2025
10:28Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System II: CRP, Hcy, and Cardiac Natriuretic Peptide Markers
These markers indicate stress or strain on the heart muscle:
Natriuretic Peptides (BNP)
Cardiac myocytes produce these hormones in response to ventricular stretching...
Coronary Artery Disease I: Introduction
Coronary Artery Disease II: Pathophysiology
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
Coronary Artery Disease III: Clinical Manifestations