Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Acute Kidney Injury I: Introduction01:22

Acute Kidney Injury I: Introduction

653
Introduction:Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) describes a swift decrease in kidney function occurring over hours to days, characterized by the kidneys' failure to remove waste products from the bloodstream. This leads to dangerous complications like metabolic acidosis, fluid overload, and electrolyte imbalances, such as hyperkalemia, which can cause life-threatening arrhythmias. AKI is common in both hospital and outpatient settings, often triggered by dehydration, sepsis, or exposure to nephrotoxic...
653
Acute Kidney Injury II: Pathophysiology01:29

Acute Kidney Injury II: Pathophysiology

994
Acute kidney injury (AKI) causes are categorized into three primary categories based on the location of the injury: prerenal, intrarenal (or intrinsic), and postrenal causes. This classification guides clinical management and illustrates how different pathways can impair kidney function.Etiology and Pathophysiology of Acute Kidney Injury1. Prerenal causesEtiology: Prerenal Acute Kidney Injury, the most common type, occurs when reduced blood flow to the kidneys decreases filtration capacity...
994
Acute Kidney Injury VI: Nursing Management01:22

Acute Kidney Injury VI: Nursing Management

433
Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) results in an inability to maintain fluid, electrolyte, and acid-base balance. Effective nursing management is critical in improving patient outcomes and includes comprehensive patient assessment and targeted interventions.Comprehensive Patient AssessmentA detailed history collection is essential, focusing on any recent infections, nephrotoxic medication use, or chronic conditions such as hypertension and diabetes that may contribute to AKI. During the physical...
433
Acute Kidney Injury V: Interprofessional Care01:20

Acute Kidney Injury V: Interprofessional Care

324
Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) requires a collaborative healthcare approach to restore renal function and prevent complications. Essential management strategies involve monitoring fluid and electrolyte balance, adjusting medications, initiating dialysis when necessary, and providing nutritional support.Fluid and Electrolyte ManagementFluid Monitoring: Regularly monitoring body weight, central venous pressure, and urine output helps detect fluid imbalances early. Patient intake and output are...
324
Acute Kidney Injury III: Clinical Manifestations01:29

Acute Kidney Injury III: Clinical Manifestations

873
Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) progresses through distinct clinical phases: the oliguric, diuretic, and recovery phases, each marked by unique manifestations and challenges.Oliguric Phase:The oliguric phase is the initial stage of AKI, typically lasting 10 to 14 days. This phase is marked by a significant reduction in urine output, usually less than 400 mL per day, indicating decreased kidney function. Fluid retention is a prominent feature, leading to symptoms such as edema, hypertension, and...
873
Acute Kidney Injury IV: Diagnostic Studies and Prevention01:30

Acute Kidney Injury IV: Diagnostic Studies and Prevention

295
Accurate diagnosis and effective prevention are critical in managing Acute Kidney Injury (AKI), which is linked to high mortality rates ranging from 10% to 80%. Timely recognition of at-risk patients and careful monitoring can significantly reduce the likelihood of kidney damage.Diagnostic Assessments:The diagnostic process starts with a comprehensive medical history to identify prerenal, intrarenal, and postrenal causes.Prerenal causes, such as dehydration, hypotension, or blood loss, should...
295

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reinforcement Learning for Intraoperative Hypotension Management with Consideration to Postoperative Acute Kidney Injury.

Kidney360·2026
Same author

Building AI competence in the healthcare workforce with the AI for clinical care workshop: A Bridge2AI for clinical CHoRUS project.

Journal of clinical and translational science·2025
Same author

Predicting Acute Kidney Injury with Nephrotoxic Burden in Noncritical Patients: An Internal and External Validation Study.

Kidney360·2025
Same author

Co-creating Consent for Data Use - AI-Powered Ethics for Biomedical AI.

NEJM AI·2025
Same author

Real-time prediction of intensive care unit patient acuity and therapy requirements using state-space modelling.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Analysis of social determinants of health and extreme climate events: Identifying vulnerable populations and health outcomes in Jacksonville.

Environmental epidemiology (Philadelphia, Pa.)·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 26, 2026

Ischemia-reperfusion Model of Acute Kidney Injury and Post Injury Fibrosis in Mice
09:09

Ischemia-reperfusion Model of Acute Kidney Injury and Post Injury Fibrosis in Mice

Published on: August 9, 2013

40.8K

Improved predictive models for acute kidney injury with IDEA: Intraoperative Data Embedded Analytics.

Lasith Adhikari1,2, Tezcan Ozrazgat-Baslanti1,2, Matthew Ruppert1,2

  • 1Division of Nephrology, Hypertension and Renal Transplantation, Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America.

Plos One
|April 5, 2019
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a new machine learning approach that improves the prediction of acute kidney injury after surgery by including real-time physiological data collected during the operation. By combining this information with standard preoperative assessments, the model more accurately identifies patients at risk compared to traditional methods.

Keywords:
perioperative risk predictionmachine learning algorithmsphysiological time-series dataclinical decision support

Frequently Asked Questions

More Related Videos

Nephrotoxin Microinjection in Zebrafish to Model Acute Kidney Injury
07:58

Nephrotoxin Microinjection in Zebrafish to Model Acute Kidney Injury

Published on: July 17, 2016

9.2K
Acute Kidney Injury Model Induced by Cisplatin in Adult Zebrafish
13:25

Acute Kidney Injury Model Induced by Cisplatin in Adult Zebrafish

Published on: May 15, 2021

6.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 26, 2026

Ischemia-reperfusion Model of Acute Kidney Injury and Post Injury Fibrosis in Mice
09:09

Ischemia-reperfusion Model of Acute Kidney Injury and Post Injury Fibrosis in Mice

Published on: August 9, 2013

40.8K
Nephrotoxin Microinjection in Zebrafish to Model Acute Kidney Injury
07:58

Nephrotoxin Microinjection in Zebrafish to Model Acute Kidney Injury

Published on: July 17, 2016

9.2K
Acute Kidney Injury Model Induced by Cisplatin in Adult Zebrafish
13:25

Acute Kidney Injury Model Induced by Cisplatin in Adult Zebrafish

Published on: May 15, 2021

6.6K

Area of Science:

  • Perioperative medicine and Intraoperative Data Embedded Analytics research
  • Clinical informatics and predictive modeling

Background:

Postoperative acute kidney injury remains a frequent surgical complication linked to elevated patient mortality and morbidity rates. Current risk assessment tools often lack broad applicability across diverse clinical settings and patient populations. Many existing frameworks fail to incorporate granular physiological information captured during the surgical procedure itself. This gap motivated researchers to seek more robust computational systems for early detection. No prior work had resolved how to effectively integrate dynamic time-series data into standard predictive workflows. That uncertainty drove the development of advanced algorithms capable of processing complex intraoperative variables. Prior research has shown that static preoperative data alone provides insufficient sensitivity for identifying high-risk individuals. This study addresses these limitations by leveraging comprehensive electronic health record information to enhance prognostic accuracy.

Purpose Of The Study:

The aim of this study is to develop an improved predictive model for acute kidney injury by incorporating intraoperative physiological time-series data. Researchers sought to address the limitations of existing perioperative risk assessment tools that rely primarily on static preoperative information. The team hypothesized that integrating dynamic intraoperative variables would enhance the accuracy and robustness of postoperative risk predictions. This investigation was motivated by the need for intelligent systems capable of leveraging new information as it becomes available during surgery. The authors specifically targeted the prediction of kidney injury risk across three distinct postoperative timeframes. They aimed to demonstrate that a machine learning stacking approach could outperform traditional models that ignore intraoperative physiological fluctuations. This work seeks to provide clinicians with a more reliable tool for identifying high-risk patients before complications manifest. The study ultimately explores how computational advancements can lead to better patient outcomes in the surgical environment.

Main Methods:

Review Approach involved utilizing a retrospective cohort of 2,911 adult surgical patients treated between 2000 and 2010. The investigators applied machine learning techniques to develop models for predicting postoperative outcomes at three distinct intervals. They constructed a stacking architecture that combined preoperative risk scores with statistical features derived from physiological time-series records. A random forest classifier served as the primary engine for integrating these diverse data streams. The team evaluated model performance using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and accuracy metrics. They also calculated the Net Reclassification Improvement to quantify the benefits of adding intraoperative variables. This methodology focused on comparing the proposed integrated system against a baseline model relying solely on preoperative information. The approach ensured that dynamic physiological fluctuations were captured and processed to enhance prognostic precision.

Main Results:

Key Findings From the Literature show that the proposed model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.86 for the seven-day outcome. This performance exceeded the 0.84 area under the curve observed with the preoperative-only model. The accuracy for the seven-day prediction reached 0.78, compared to 0.76 for the baseline approach. By incorporating intraoperative features, the algorithm successfully reclassified 40% of patients previously misidentified as false negatives. The Net Reclassification Improvement for the three-day outcome was 8%, while the seven-day outcome showed a 7% improvement. The overall hospitalization risk prediction demonstrated a 4% improvement in Net Reclassification Improvement. These results indicate that dynamic data integration consistently enhances the sensitivity and specificity of postoperative risk assessments. The study confirms that leveraging real-time physiological information provides a measurable advantage over static preoperative data alone.

Conclusions:

The authors suggest that integrating intraoperative statistical features significantly boosts the predictive power of standard preoperative models. Their findings indicate that dynamic data incorporation allows for better identification of patients who might otherwise be missed. The researchers propose that this stacking approach effectively captures complex physiological patterns during the surgical window. Synthesis and implications reveal that machine learning models can achieve higher sensitivity and specificity than traditional static assessments. The study demonstrates that reclassifying false negatives remains a primary benefit of adding real-time physiological inputs. These results imply that clinical decision support systems should prioritize the inclusion of intraoperative time-series information. The authors conclude that their proposed framework offers a viable path toward more personalized perioperative care. Future applications of this methodology may help clinicians intervene earlier to mitigate the risk of kidney damage.

The researchers propose a stacking approach using a random forest classifier to integrate intraoperative statistical features. This method improves upon preoperative-only models by dynamically processing time-series data, which allows for the reclassification of 40% of false negative patients identified by previous static assessments.

The study utilizes Intraoperative Data Embedded Analytics (IDEA), a framework designed to incorporate physiological time-series variables. This tool enables the system to process complex, high-frequency information captured during surgery, which is often neglected by standard preoperative risk scoring systems.

The authors state that integrating intraoperative features is necessary to improve the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and overall accuracy. This inclusion allows the model to capture physiological fluctuations that occur during the procedure, which are absent in preoperative-only data.

The researchers employ a retrospective cohort of 2,911 adult surgical patients. This data type allows the algorithm to train on historical outcomes, facilitating the development of models that predict injury risk across three specific postoperative timeframes: three days, seven days, and the entire index hospitalization.

The model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.86 and an accuracy of 0.78 for the seven-day outcome. In comparison, the preoperative-only model reached an area under the curve of 0.84 and an accuracy of 0.76.

The authors propose that their model provides higher sensitivity and specificity for postoperative risk assessment. They suggest that this approach effectively leverages new information as it becomes available, offering a more robust alternative to existing perioperative prediction tools.