Using proteomics to advance the search for potential biomarkers for preeclampsia: A systematic review and

Thy Pham Hoai Nguyen1, Cameron James Patrick2, Laura Jean Parry1

  • 1School of BioSciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.

Plos One
|April 6, 2019
PubMed

Insights

High-throughput proteomics can identify novel biomarkers for preeclampsia (PE), a major cause of maternal mortality. This unbiased approach reveals 13 common proteins, improving PE prediction and understanding its complex origins.

Area of Science:

  • Proteomics
  • Biomarker Discovery
  • Maternal Health

Background:

  • Preeclampsia (PE) is a significant global cause of maternal and perinatal mortality.
  • Current predictive screening methods have limitations, particularly for nulliparous and low-risk women.
  • The heterogeneity of PE suggests a need for broader biomarker discovery beyond angiogenesis and inflammation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the potential of high-throughput proteomics for comprehensive and unbiased biomarker identification in preeclampsia.
  • To identify novel protein biomarkers for improved prediction and understanding of PE etiology.

Main Methods:

  • A systematic literature search identified 45 eligible studies with proteomic data from PE patients.
  • Analysis focused on identifying commonly altered circulating proteins across these studies.
  • An additional literature review validated the potential of identified proteins as biomarkers.

Main Results:

  • From 710 altered proteins, 13 common circulating proteins were identified.
  • Several of these proteins were not previously recognized as potential PE biomarkers.
  • Notably, 9 of the 13 identified proteins had been independently evaluated in prior PE studies.

Conclusions:

  • High-throughput proteomics offers a powerful, unbiased strategy for identifying protein profiles to enhance PE prediction.
  • The findings underscore the potential of novel protein biomarkers for a deeper understanding of PE's complex origins.
  • Standardized data collection and early-trimester sample analysis in high-throughput studies could significantly advance biomarker discovery.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Review and Preview01:10

Review and Preview

In statistics, several tools are used to interpret the data. Measures of central tendency represent the characteristics of the data, such as mean, median, and mode. Additionally, measures of variance like standard deviation and range are used to find the spread of data from the mean. Relative standing measures the distance between data locations. Commonly used measures of relative standings are percentile, z score, and quartiles.
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
8.3K
Review and Preview01:13

Review and Preview

Data are individual items of information obtained from a population or sample. Data may be classified as qualitative (categorical), quantitative continuous, or quantitative discrete. Because it is not practical to measure the entire population in a study, researchers use samples to represent the population. A random sample is a representative group from the population chosen by using a method that gives each individual in the population an equal chance of being included in the sample. Random...
10.9K
Sample Preparation for Analysis: Advanced Techniques01:08

Sample Preparation for Analysis: Advanced Techniques

Accurate analysis of complex samples often requires advanced preparation techniques to achieve reliable and reproducible results. Samples containing inorganic or organic materials can be challenging to dissolve or decompose effectively. Standard sample preparation methods include acid digestion, fusion, dry ashing, and wet digestion.
Acid digestion with strong acids is commonly used to dissolve inorganic materials that are insoluble (do not dissolve) in water. This method can be useful for...
1.3K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
14.7K
Directing Effect of Substituents: meta-Directing Groups01:09

Directing Effect of Substituents: meta-Directing Groups

Substituents on the benzene ring that direct an incoming electrophile to undergo substitution at the meta position are called meta directors. All meta directors either have a positive charge on the atom directly bonded to the ring or a partial positive charge. These groups function by withdrawing electrons from the ring through inductive and resonance effects. Consider the carbocation intermediates formed upon the addition of an electrophile on nitrobenzene at the...
5.9K
Systematic Sampling Method01:17

Systematic Sampling Method

Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
Systematic sampling is one of the simplest methods...
12.8K