Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 26, 2026

Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making
Published on: March 2, 2011
How economic inequality shapes mobility expectations and behaviour in disadvantaged youth
Alexander S Browman1, Mesmin Destin2,3,4, Melissa S Kearney5,6
1Lynch School of Education, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts, USA.
Abstract:
Economic inequality can have a range of negative consequences for those in younger generations, particularly for those from lower-socioeconomic status (SES) backgrounds. Economists and psychologists, among other social scientists, have addressed this issue, but have proceeded largely in parallel. This Perspective outlines how these disciplines have proposed and provided empirical support for complementary theoretical models. Specifically, both disciplines emphasize that inequality weakens people's belief in socioeconomic opportunity, thereby reducing the likelihood that low-SES young people will engage in behaviours that would improve their chances of upward mobility (for example, persisting in school or averting teenage pregnancy). In integrating the methods and techniques of economics and psychology, we offer a cohesive framework for considering this issue. When viewed as a whole, the interdisciplinary body of evidence presents a more complete and compelling framework than does either discipline alone. We use this unification to offer policy recommendations that would advance prospects for mobility among low-SES young people.
Related Concept Videos
Expected Value
Determination of Expected Frequency
Molecular Shape and Polarity
VSEPR Theory and the Basic Shapes
Molecular Shapes
Two regions of electron density in a diatomic...
First Derivatives and the Shape of a Graph

