Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 26, 2026

Neutron Radiography and Computed Tomography of Biological Systems at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory's High Flux Isotope Reactor
Published on: May 7, 2021
Ex Vivo Detection of Apical Delta in Premolars: A Comparative Study Using Periapical Radiography, Cone-beam Computed
Eduarda Helena Leandro Nascimento1, Marcela Ramos Abrahão Elias2, Victor Hugo Fernandes Vasconcelos2
1Department of Oral Diagnosis, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, Sáo Paulo, Brazil.
Introduction:
Imaging methods are essential for the correct identification of root canal anatomy, which is a key factor for successful endodontic therapy. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of periapical radiography (PR) and cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) imaging in identifying the apical delta (AD) using micro-computed tomographic imaging as the gold standard.
Methods:
PR and CBCT images of 110 human premolars (120 root canals) were obtained using the VistaScan digital intraoral system (Durr Dental, Beitigheim-Bissinger, Germany) and the 3D Accuitomo CBCT unit (J Morita, Kyoto, Japan), respectively. Two oral radiologists assessed the PR and CBCT images for the presence of ADs using a 5-point scale. Additionally, in the CBCT images, the number of apical foramina was also evaluated. The gold standard was established by means of micro-computed tomographic imaging. The diagnostic values related to PR and CBCT imaging were compared using the McNemar test. The detection of the number of foramina was compared using the paired t test (α ≤ 0.05).
Results:
ADs were present in 40 root canals (33.3%). Both PR and CBCT images differed significantly from the gold standard (P < .05) in the detection of ADs. CBCT imaging showed higher values than PR for all diagnostic tests (P < .05). Despite the moderate accuracy of PR (0.62) and CBCT imaging (0.73), these methods presented very low sensitivity values (0.07 and 0.35 for PR and CBCT, respectively). CBCT imaging had a tendency of underestimating the number of foramina (P < .05).
Conclusions:
CBCT imaging showed better performance than PR in the detection of ADs; both imaging modalities underestimate its presence when compared with the gold standard. In general, the number of apical foramina cannot be reliably assessed using CBCT imaging.
More Related Videos
04:24Proper Positioning and Restraint of a Rat Hind Limb for Focused High Resolution Imaging of Bone Micro-architecture Using In Vivo Micro-computed Tomography
Published on: November 22, 2017
05:37Cone Beam Intraoperative Computed Tomography-based Image Guidance for Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion
Published on: August 6, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Computed Tomography
The technique was invented in the 1970s and is based on the principle that as X-rays pass through the body, they are absorbed or reflected at different levels. In the technique, a patient lies on a motorized platform while a computerized axial tomography (CAT) scanner rotates...
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography
Design Example: Traverse Angle Computations
Imaging Studies II: Positron Emission Tomography and Scintigraphy
Fundamental Principles of PET
Area Computation by the Alternative Coordinate Method
Positron Emission Tomography
One of the main requirements of a PET scan is a positron-emitting radioisotope, which is produced in a cyclotron and then attached to a substance used by the part of the body...