Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 26, 2026

Pore-scale Imaging and Characterization of Hydrocarbon Reservoir Rock Wettability at Subsurface Conditions Using X-ray Microtomography
Published on: October 21, 2018
Quantification of contact lens wettability after prolonged visual device use under low humidity conditions
Michel Guillon1, Trisha Patel2, Kishan Patel2
1OCULAR TECHNOLOGY GROUP - International, 66 Buckingham Gate, London SW1E 6AU, UK; School of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Aston Express Way, Birmingham B4 7ET, UK.
Purpose:
Discomfort of silicone hydrogel (SiHy) contact lenses (CL) is associated with longer wearing time, demanding visual tasks, and dry environments. This study investigated the impact of challenging environmental conditions on thewettability of four daily disposable SiHy CL.
Methods:
Habitual wearers of delefilcon A (n=32) and somofilcon A (n=32) were tested with their habitual lenses and with stenfilcon A and narafilcon A lenses. Digital videos were captured using non-invasive Tearscope illumination after 3 hrs of conventional wear and 3 hrs of computer use at 20% relative humidity (RH). Masked investigators analysed non-invasive break up time (NIBUT), minimum protected area (MPA) ofthe lens surface by the tear film, and dehydration speed (DS) over the interblink period after exposure to 20% RH.
Results:
For habitual delefilcon A wearers, mean NIBUT was longer with delefilcon A (9.2 sec) than stenfilcon A (6.3 sec, p = 0.052) and narafilcon A (5.1 sec, p = 0.006); mean MPA was significantly higher with delefilcon A (95.4%)than stenfilcon A (84.4%, p = 0.002) and narafilcon A (82.9%, p = 0.006); mean DS was lower with delefilcon A (0.28 mm2/sec) than stenfilcon A (0.81 mm2/sec, p = 0.002) and narafilcon A (0.60 mm2/sec, p = 0.056). For habitual somofilcon A wearers, mean MPA was lower for narafilcon A (76.2%) than for somofilcon A (89.0%, p < 0.001) but not stenfilcon A (88.4%, p = 0.748) and mean DS was higher for narafilcon A (0.96 mm2/sec) than somofilcon A (0.60mm2/sec, p = 0.029) but not stenfilcon A (0.51 mm2/sec, p = 0.701).
Conclusions:
Delefilcon A CL performed betterthan stenfilcon A and narafilcon A after 6 hrs of wear including 3 hrs intensive visual tasks under challenging environmental conditions. Delefilcon A CL may be preferable for CL wearers with intensive computers and/or digital devices usage.
Related Concept Videos
Contact-dependent Signaling
Gap Junctions
In animal cells, gap junctions are formed...
Contact Angle
The adhesive force is the molecular force between molecules of different materials, that is, between the molecules of the solid and the liquid. The cohesive...
Conditions on Early Earth
Classical Conditioning
Ivan Pavlov observed that dogs...
Conditions of Equilibrium
Internal forces are not considered for conditions of equilibrium because they occur in equal and opposite pairs within the body, effectively canceling each other. As a result,...
Operant Conditioning
Reinforcement in operant conditioning can be positive or negative, both of which serve to increase the likelihood of a behavior. Positive...

