Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 26, 2026

Generation of Porcine Testicular Organoids with Testis Specific Architecture using Microwell Culture
Published on: October 3, 2019
Testis-sparing surgery for testicular masses: current perspectives
Roberto La Rocca1, Marco Capece2, Lorenzo Spirito1
1Department of Urology, Federico II University, Naples, Italy.
Introduction:
Males who present with a palpable testis nodule are likely to have malignant germ cell tumor in >90% of cases. Therefore radical orchiectomy remains the standard of care for intratesticular tumors. However, due to the recent developments of high-frequency probes in ultrasonography, the incidence of detecting a small non-palpable testis tumor is higher and higher. These lesions are thought to be benign in more than 60-80% of cases, thus a radical orchiectomy should be considered an overtreatment. In addition to that, radical orchiectomy might cause infertility, psychological issues and endocrine disorders, hence an organ-sparing procedure in such cases should be pursued.
Evidence Acquisition:
Only fourteen reliable retrospective studies met the inclusion criteria. No prospective randomized trials have appeared in Medline database.
Evidence Synthesis:
This review of the current literature has confirmed the safety and efficacy of testicular-sparing surgery in selected patients: 1) monorchid patients; 2) bilateral testis masses; 3) normal patients with a small, non-palpable masses detected with US, as long as the dimension of the lesion is up to 3 cm and not greater that 30% of the total volume of the organ.
Conclusions:
According to the literature, testis sparing surgery is a safe and feasible procedure for patients presenting a benign small testis mass. The enthusiasm found in the literature should however be tempered as the small number of patients reported in the studies coupled with the absence of a prospective trial represent important limits that need to be overtaken. Therefore more robust and well-designed studies are needed.
Insights
Testis sparing surgery is safe for select patients with small, non-palpable testicular masses. Radical orchiectomy may be overtreatment, but more research is needed to confirm long-term outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Urology
- Oncology
- Surgical Oncology
Background:
- Palpable testicular nodules are malignant in over 90% of cases, making radical orchiectomy standard care.
- High-frequency ultrasonography detects more small, non-palpable testicular tumors, often benign (60-80%).
- Radical orchiectomy can lead to infertility, psychological issues, and endocrine disorders, highlighting the need for organ-sparing alternatives.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the safety and efficacy of testicular-sparing surgery for non-palpable testicular masses.
- To identify patient selection criteria for organ-sparing testicular procedures.
Main Methods:
- A systematic review of retrospective studies was conducted.
- Fourteen reliable retrospective studies met the inclusion criteria.
- No prospective randomized trials were identified in the Medline database.
Main Results:
- Testicular-sparing surgery is safe and effective in selected patients.
- Suitable candidates include monorchid patients, those with bilateral testicular masses, and individuals with small (<3 cm, <30% volume) non-palpable masses detected via ultrasound.
- The review confirmed the feasibility of organ-sparing procedures for benign small testicular masses.
Conclusions:
- Testis sparing surgery is a safe and feasible option for patients with benign small testicular masses.
- The current evidence is limited by the small number of patients and the absence of prospective trials.
- Further robust, well-designed studies are necessary to solidify the role of testicular-sparing surgery.
Related Concept Videos
Spare Receptors
Psychodynamic Perspectives on Personality
Psychodynamic theorists argue that unconscious...
The Behavioral Perspective on Personality
Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective
Evolutionary psychology provides one explanation for these findings, suggesting...
Social Cognitive Perspective on Personality
Changes in Skin Color: Clinical Perspectives
Albinism
Albinism is a genetic disorder that affects (completely or partially) the coloring of skin, hair, and eyes. The defect is primarily...

