Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Factors Affecting Drug Distribution: Miscellaneous Factors01:19

Factors Affecting Drug Distribution: Miscellaneous Factors

976
Drug distribution in the human body is a complex process influenced by various individual factors, including age, pregnancy, obesity, diet, body water composition, pH levels, and specific disease conditions.
Age plays a significant role due to differences in body composition among different age groups. Infants, for instance, have a higher proportion of total body water and lower albumin levels, a protein that binds drugs in the bloodstream. This unique composition in infants enhances the...
976
Factors Affecting Drug Distribution: Tissue Permeability01:30

Factors Affecting Drug Distribution: Tissue Permeability

630
The drug distribution process within the human body is a complex interplay of various physicochemical properties inherent to the drugs. These properties, including molecular size, ionization degree, partition coefficient, and stereochemical nature, significantly impact how drugs permeate biological membranes to reach their target tissues.
Small molecules with a molecular weight below 500 to 600 Daltons can easily pass through the capillary membrane, gaining access to different tissues. Larger...
630
Factors Affecting Drug Distribution: Physiological Barriers01:23

Factors Affecting Drug Distribution: Physiological Barriers

705
Drug distribution in the body is intricately regulated by various physiological barriers that control the passage of substances. These include the capillary endothelial barrier, the blood-brain, blood-cerebrospinal fluid, blood-placental, and blood-testis barriers.
The capillary endothelial barrier allows only smaller molecules below 600 Da (Daltons) to pass through. It also restricts drugs like heparin that are bound to blood components, limiting their movement within the bloodstream.
The...
705
Factors Affecting Drug Distribution: Organ Perfusion Rate01:15

Factors Affecting Drug Distribution: Organ Perfusion Rate

567
Drug distribution within the body is a complex process influenced by several factors, including perfusion rate, the rate at which the bloodstream transports drugs to tissue. This limitation becomes particularly significant when dealing with highly lipophilic drugs. In such cases, the rate at which the drug can move across membranes is crucial, and if the membrane is highly permeable to the drug, distribution becomes rate-limited by perfusion.
Perfusion rate-limited distribution relies on the...
567
Factors Affecting Renal Clearance: Drug Distribution and Drug Interactions01:09

Factors Affecting Renal Clearance: Drug Distribution and Drug Interactions

522
Renal clearance plays a pivotal role in drug elimination from the body and can be influenced by drug distribution and interactions. Understanding these factors is crucial in pharmacology as they impact the effectiveness and duration of drug therapy.
One important factor is the relationship between renal clearance and the apparent volume of distribution. Renal clearance tends to be inversely proportional to the apparent volume of distribution. Drugs with an extensive distribution volume or those...
522
Sampling Plans01:23

Sampling Plans

911
Sampling is a crucial step in analytical chemistry, allowing researchers to collect representative data from a large population. Common sampling methods include random, judgmental, systematic, stratified, and cluster sampling.
Random sampling is a method where each member of the population has an equal chance of being selected for the sample. It involves selecting individuals randomly, often using random number generators or lottery-type methods. For example, when analyzing the properties of a...
911

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evidence-Based Safe Firearm Storage Counseling in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.

Hospital pediatrics·2026
Same author

Rethinking reciprocity.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same author

Development and Clinical Validation of a Protocol-Agnostic Machine Learning Platform for Automated Treatment Planning in External Beam Radiation Therapy.

Advances in radiation oncology·2026
Same author

Synergistic Effects of Mesoporous Structure and Oxygen Vacancies in SnO<sub>2</sub> for Enhanced CO<sub>2</sub> Electroreduction.

Small science·2026
Same author

A Primer on Treatment Planning Aspects for Temporally Modulated Pulsed Radiation Therapy.

Practical radiation oncology·2026
Same author

Solid-phase Chalcogenization for the Synthesis of High-Quality Transition-Metal Dichalcogenide Monolayers.

Journal of the American Chemical Society·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 26, 2026

Radiation Planning Assistant - A Streamlined, Fully Automated Radiotherapy Treatment Planning System
08:25

Radiation Planning Assistant - A Streamlined, Fully Automated Radiotherapy Treatment Planning System

Published on: April 11, 2018

15.9K

Determining efficient helical IMRT modulation factor from the MLC leaf-open time distribution on precision treatment

Robert Boyd1, Kyoungkeun Jeong1, Wolfgang A Tomé1

  • 1Department of Radiation Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.

Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
|April 9, 2019
PubMed
Summary

This study presents a method to determine an optimal modulation factor (MF) from leaf-open time (LOT) data in tomotherapy Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT). This approach balances treatment delivery efficiency and plan quality for better radiation therapy outcomes.

Keywords:
leaf-open timemodulation factortomotherapytreatment planning

More Related Videos

Helical Organization of Blood Coagulation Factor VIII on Lipid Nanotubes
12:24

Helical Organization of Blood Coagulation Factor VIII on Lipid Nanotubes

Published on: June 3, 2014

12.7K
Modification and Application of a Leaf Blower-vac for Field Sampling of Arthropods
09:43

Modification and Application of a Leaf Blower-vac for Field Sampling of Arthropods

Published on: August 10, 2016

9.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 26, 2026

Radiation Planning Assistant - A Streamlined, Fully Automated Radiotherapy Treatment Planning System
08:25

Radiation Planning Assistant - A Streamlined, Fully Automated Radiotherapy Treatment Planning System

Published on: April 11, 2018

15.9K
Helical Organization of Blood Coagulation Factor VIII on Lipid Nanotubes
12:24

Helical Organization of Blood Coagulation Factor VIII on Lipid Nanotubes

Published on: June 3, 2014

12.7K
Modification and Application of a Leaf Blower-vac for Field Sampling of Arthropods
09:43

Modification and Application of a Leaf Blower-vac for Field Sampling of Arthropods

Published on: August 10, 2016

9.2K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Physics
  • Radiation Oncology
  • Radiotherapy Planning

Background:

  • Modulation factor (MF) critically influences Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) plan quality and delivery efficiency in tomotherapy.
  • Optimizing MF is essential for balancing treatment efficacy and patient throughput.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To demonstrate a novel technique for determining an efficient modulation factor (MF) from the Multileaf Collimator (MLC) leaf-open time (LOT) distribution.
  • To establish a method for deriving an optimal MF in tomotherapy IMRT planning.

Main Methods:

  • Eight clinical tomotherapy plans were optimized using the highest allowed MF.
  • Reduced MFs were calculated from the LOT distribution using a central limit theorem approach.
  • Plan comparison tools evaluated dosimetric differences between reduced-MF and reference plans.

Main Results:

  • A reduced-MF plan was identified that effectively balanced delivery time and dosimetric quality.
  • The reduced-MF plan demonstrated excellent agreement with the reference plan, with minimal dose differences.

Conclusions:

  • A methodology for deriving a reduced MF from LOT distribution using the central limit theorem was successfully presented.
  • The presented scheme enables efficient generation of high-quality, time-efficient tomotherapy plans without prior knowledge of optimal MF.