Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 26, 2026

Porcine As a Training Module for Head and Neck Microvascular Reconstruction
Published on: September 29, 2018
Immune Evasion by Head and Neck Cancer: Foundations for Combination Therapy
Joshua D Horton1, Hannah M Knochelmann2, Terry A Day1
1Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Abstract:
Head and neck cancer is disfiguring and deadly, and contemporary treatment has fallen short in terms of morbidity and mortality. The rich immune infiltrate within these tumors designates them as prime candidates for immunotherapy and success with these drugs has been documented for recurrent and metastatic head and neck cancer. Still, single-agent immunotherapy has generated either only transient responses or durable response in only a minority subset of patients. Mapping the immune escape mechanisms enacted by head and neck cancer within the tumor microenvironment allows for rational design of strategies to overcome this tolerance. We outline the immune pathway derangements within the head and neck cancer microenvironment and discuss combination treatment strategies to overcome the limitations of immunologic monotherapy.
Insights
Head and neck cancers are disfiguring and deadly. Combining immunotherapies may overcome tumor resistance and improve patient outcomes for this challenging disease.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Immunology
- Cancer Research
Background:
- Head and neck cancer presents significant morbidity and mortality.
- Immunotherapy shows promise for recurrent/metastatic disease, but responses are often limited.
- Tumor-infiltrating immune cells suggest potential for immunotherapeutic intervention.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze immune escape mechanisms in the head and neck cancer tumor microenvironment.
- To identify rational combination strategies to enhance immunotherapy efficacy.
- To overcome limitations associated with single-agent immunotherapy.
Main Methods:
- Review of immune pathway derangements within the head and neck cancer microenvironment.
- Analysis of existing immunotherapy response data.
- Literature review on combination treatment strategies.
Main Results:
- Single-agent immunotherapy provides transient or durable responses in a subset of patients.
- Head and neck cancers employ specific immune escape mechanisms.
- Combination strategies are being developed to enhance therapeutic outcomes.
Conclusions:
- Understanding immune evasion is crucial for improving head and neck cancer treatment.
- Combination immunotherapy offers a promising approach to overcome treatment resistance.
- Targeting the tumor microenvironment can enhance durable responses in head and neck cancer.
Related Concept Videos
Arteries of the Head and Neck
The internal carotid arteries supply blood to the anterior portion of the cerebrum. They enter the...
Veins of Head and Neck
On the other hand, the vertebral veins, unlike their arterial counterparts, are not primarily responsible for brain drainage. Instead, they drain the cervical vertebrae, spinal cord, and some small...
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Physiological Foundation of Stress
Role of the Sympathetic Nervous System
Adrenaline triggers the...

