Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

7.4K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
7.4K
Reasoning01:30

Reasoning

426
Reasoning is the action of thinking about something in a logical, sensible way. It is integral to problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking. Reasoning can be inductive or deductive. Reasoning involves transforming information into conclusions, which is essential for problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking.
Inductive reasoning involves deriving generalizations from specific observations. This type of reasoning helps form beliefs about the world. For example,...
426
Deductive Reasoning01:16

Deductive Reasoning

65.2K
Deductive reasoning, or deduction, is the type of logic used in hypothesis-based science. In deductive reasoning, the pattern of thinking moves in the opposite direction as compared to inductive reasoning, which means that it uses a general principle or law to predict specific results. From those general principles, a scientist can deduce and predict the specific results that would be valid as long as the general principles are valid.
For example, a researcher can deduce specific predictions...
65.2K
Inductive Reasoning00:59

Inductive Reasoning

66.0K
Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It is uncertain and operates in degrees to which the conclusions are credible. As such, inductive arguments can be weak or strong, rather than valid or invalid, and conclusions can be used to formulate testable, falsifiable hypotheses.
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
66.0K
Characteristics of Practical Op Amps01:16

Characteristics of Practical Op Amps

843
A difference amplifier, a crucial component in numerous electronic devices, ideally amplifies only the difference-mode signal, which is the difference between two input signals. However, in practical circuits, the output voltage depends on both the differential gain and the common-mode gain.
The ratio of differential gain to the common-mode gain is defined as the common-mode rejection ratio (CMRR). This ratio quantifies the ability of operational amplifiers (op-amps) to reject common-mode...
843
Theoretical Foundations of Nursing Practice01:30

Theoretical Foundations of Nursing Practice

17.3K
Theories play an essential role in organizing patient care. Theories refer to a proposed or followed belief, policy, or procedure that is the basis for action. Nursing theories are knowledge-based concepts that guide nurses' actions, influence nursing education and practice, and allow nurses to care for their patients.
Theories provide a perspective to assess patients' conditions and organize data and methods. They also assist in analyzing and interpreting information. They represent a...
17.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same journal

Offloading Adherence for Appearance's Sake?

Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association·2026
Same journal

Effect of Insoles on Plantar Fascia Tension During Running in Individuals with Flatfoot.

Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association·2026
Same journal

Reducing Lower Extremity Amputations via Peer Support Interventions: A Scoping Review.

Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association·2026
Same journal

Quantitative Assessment of the Correlation Between 'COVID Toes' Search Volume and COVID-19 Case Incidence and Mortality Dynamics: A Longitudinal Data-Driven Approach.

Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association·2026
Same journal

Reconsidering Nerve Decompression Surgery in Diabetes Foot Complications.

Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association·2026
Same journal

Quantification of the Mechanical Response of the Plantar Fascia to Changes in Rearfoot Position.

Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 26, 2026

Assessing the Coherence of Parents' Short Narratives Regarding their Child Using the Five-Minute Speech Sample Procedure
07:56

Assessing the Coherence of Parents' Short Narratives Regarding their Child Using the Five-Minute Speech Sample Procedure

Published on: September 19, 2019

10.6K

Narrative Reasoning in Practice A Case Study in Podiatry.

Emily T Bishop

    Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association
    |April 10, 2019
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Narrative reasoning, a patient-centered approach, effectively analyzes clinical decisions, even those contrary to evidence, leading to positive outcomes. This interpretive model enhances healthcare decision-making strategies.

    More Related Videos

    Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
    14:32

    Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

    Published on: February 16, 2011

    24.4K
    Practical Methodology of Cognitive Tasks Within a Navigational Assessment
    05:19

    Practical Methodology of Cognitive Tasks Within a Navigational Assessment

    Published on: June 1, 2015

    14.0K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Jan 26, 2026

    Assessing the Coherence of Parents' Short Narratives Regarding their Child Using the Five-Minute Speech Sample Procedure
    07:56

    Assessing the Coherence of Parents' Short Narratives Regarding their Child Using the Five-Minute Speech Sample Procedure

    Published on: September 19, 2019

    10.6K
    Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
    14:32

    Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

    Published on: February 16, 2011

    24.4K
    Practical Methodology of Cognitive Tasks Within a Navigational Assessment
    05:19

    Practical Methodology of Cognitive Tasks Within a Navigational Assessment

    Published on: June 1, 2015

    14.0K

    Area of Science:

    • Healthcare Decision-Making
    • Clinical Reasoning
    • Medical Ethics

    Background:

    • Clinical reasoning and decision-making are crucial in evidence-based healthcare.
    • Healthcare decisions are influenced by intrinsic and extrinsic factors.
    • Various reasoning paradigms exist within healthcare practice.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To explore the application of narrative reasoning in analyzing a specific clinical decision.
    • To examine the interplay between evidence-based practice, ethical considerations, and patient outcomes.

    Main Methods:

    • A 3-month reflective diary was maintained, linking personal clinical decisions with theoretical learning on clinical reasoning.
    • Multiple decision-making paradigms were reviewed, with a focus on narrative reasoning.
    • The author's background in literature influenced the resonance with narrative reasoning.

    Main Results:

    • Narrative reasoning provided a useful framework for analyzing the clinical decision.
    • The decision, though potentially contrary to evidence, resulted in a positive patient outcome.
    • The positive outcome was evaluated within the context of evidence-based and ethical practice.

    Conclusions:

    • Narrative reasoning, rooted in interpretive research, prioritizes the patient's experience in decision-making.
    • It offers a valuable method for integrating diagnostic, management, and ethical aspects of care.
    • Further research, especially in podiatry, is needed to explore reasoning strategies for complex and chronic conditions.