Learning curve for multidisciplinary team setup in veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for acute...

Quality control is essential for a successful extracorporeal membrane oxygenation program. We investigated the learning curve for outcome improvement and focused on factors associated with failure of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation treatment.

Between August 2011 and May 2017, 150 patients were supported with veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for acute respiratory failure. The learning curve was examined using cumulative sum analysis. We defined successful extracorporeal membrane oxygenation treatment as intensive care unit discharge, acceptable failure rate as 40%, and unacceptable failure rate as 60%. We chronologically divided patients into three periods with 50 consecutive patients each and retrospectively compared the clinical outcomes by period.

Overall, weaning and survival to discharge rates were 72.7% and 56%, respectively. Cumulative sum analysis indicated that the extracorporeal membrane oxygenation team achieved nearly acceptable performance after 56 cases and consistently acceptable performance after 104 cases. Clinical outcomes were improved by period: weaning rate (58% vs. 80% vs. 80%, p = 0.017); intensive care unit discharge rate (42% vs. 60% vs. 78%, p = 0.001); survival to discharge rate (40% vs. 58% vs. 70%, p = 0.010); and 1 year survival rate (40% vs. 56% vs. 70%, p = 0.010). In multivariate analysis, infection (odds ratio: 4.54, 95% confidence interval: 1.83-11.27, p = 0.001), immune compromise (odds ratio: 5.78, 95% confidence interval: 1.66-20.14, p = 0.006), extracorporeal membrane oxygenation team period (odds ratio: 2.12, 95% confidence interval: 1.14-3.92, p = 0.017), and age (odds ratio: 1.09, 95% confidence interval: 1.05-1.14, p < 0.001) were associated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation failure.

More than 100 cases of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation experience were necessary for acceptable performance and stabilization of outcomes.