Translational Multi-Disciplinary Approach for the Drug and Gene Delivery Systems for Cancer Treatment

Rachna Nayak1, Igor Meerovich1, Alekha K Dash2

  • 1Department of Pharmacy Sciences, School of Pharmacy and Health Professions, Creighton University, 2500 California Plaza, Omaha, Nebraska, 68178, USA.

AAPS Pharmscitech
|April 11, 2019
PubMed

Insights

Nanoparticulate delivery systems offer advanced cancer therapy, but clinical translation faces hurdles. Overcoming challenges in preclinical testing, regulatory approval, and manufacturing is key for nanomedicine to reach patients.

Area of Science:

  • Nanomedicine
  • Cancer Therapy
  • Drug Delivery Systems

Background:

  • Nanoparticulate systems are advanced tools for drug and gene delivery in cancer therapy.
  • Despite promising in vitro and in vivo results, clinical translation of nanomedicine remains challenging.
  • Existing gaps in translation are linked to oversimplified models, poor correlation of animal data with human outcomes, and complex systemic delivery.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review advancements in nanomedicine for anti-cancer therapy.
  • To identify and discuss challenges hindering the clinical translation of nanomedicine.
  • To highlight the importance of addressing these challenges for effective nanomedicine implementation.

Main Methods:

  • Review of current nanomedicine approaches for cancer therapy.
  • Analysis of passive targeting, active targeting, and stimuli-controlled delivery strategies.
  • Identification of translational challenges in preclinical testing, regulatory processes, and manufacturing.

Main Results:

  • Nanomedicine offers diverse strategies including passive, active, and stimuli-responsive targeting for cancer treatment.
  • Significant barriers to clinical translation persist, including inadequate preclinical models and regulatory hurdles.
  • Manufacturing scale-up presents difficulties for nanodrug delivery systems.

Conclusions:

  • Addressing the identified challenges is crucial for bridging the gap between nanomedicine research and clinical application.
  • Improved preclinical models, clear regulatory pathways, and scalable manufacturing are essential for successful nanomedicine translation.
  • A comprehensive understanding of these translational issues will facilitate the effective use of nanomedicine in cancer therapy.

Related Concept Videos

Multi-input and Multi-variable systems01:22

Multi-input and Multi-variable systems

Cruise control systems in cars are designed as multi-input systems to maintain a driver's desired speed while compensating for external disturbances such as changes in terrain. The block diagram for a cruise control system typically includes two main inputs: the desired speed set by the driver and any external disturbances, such as the incline of the road. By adjusting the engine throttle, the system maintains the vehicle's speed as close to the desired value as possible.
In the absence of...
404
Treatment Resistant Cancers02:56

Treatment Resistant Cancers

Cancer is the second leading cause of death in the United States. A cancer cell is genetically unstable and hence can mutate faster. They can also modify their microenvironment and escape immune surveillance. The difficulties in treating cancer are further compounded by the emergence of rapid resistance to anticancer drugs. The most common ways to attain resistance in cancer cells include alteration in drug transport and metabolism, modification of drug target, elevated DNA damage response, or...
3.7K
Drug Delivery: Overview01:16

Drug Delivery: Overview

The selection of a drug's delivery route depends upon its physicochemical properties, including lipid or water solubility and ionization, as well as the therapeutic requirement, such as immediate or sustained effect. These routes can be divided into three primary categories: enteral, parenteral, and topical.
Enteral delivery involves administering drugs directly through swallowing, sublingual placement, or buccal application. Orally administered drugs predominantly navigate the...
803
Drug Delivery: Enteral Route01:18

Drug Delivery: Enteral Route

The enteral drug administration involves three primary routes: oral, sublingual, and buccal. Oral ingestion is the most prevalent, safe, economical, and convenient method for drug administration. However, it has certain drawbacks, including limited absorption due to the drug's low water solubility or poor membrane permeability, possible emesis from GI mucosa irritation, destruction of drugs by digestive enzymes or low gastric pH, and irregular absorption along with food or other drugs.
1.7K
Drug Delivery: Parenteral Route01:29

Drug Delivery: Parenteral Route

The parenteral route is a critical method of drug administration. It delivers compounds directly into the systemic circulation and bypasses the gastrointestinal tract. This approach is particularly advantageous for drugs that exhibit poor absorption or instability when administered orally.
There are three primary parenteral routes: intravenous (IV), intramuscular (IM), and subcutaneous (SC). The IV route introduces the drug directly into the bloodstream, ensuring immediate action. The IM route...
1.6K
Drug Delivery: Miscellaneous Routes01:22

Drug Delivery: Miscellaneous Routes

Drug delivery methods like oral inhalation, nasal sprays, transdermal patches, eye drops, intravitreal injection,  and rectal administration provide localized effects with reduced toxicity.
Oral inhalation and nasal sprays swiftly transfer drugs across the respiratory epithelium's mucosal layer. Inhaled glucocorticoids and bronchodilators directly target lung conditions such as asthma, while fluticasone nasal spray mitigates allergic rhinitis.
Transdermal patches transport drugs...
758