Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 26, 2026

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Relationship Between Lipotoxicity and HFpEF
Published on: March 29, 2024
Utility and limitations of ejection fraction and of diastolic dysfunction in heart failure patients
Gian Francesco Mureddu1, Andrea Faggiano
1San Giovanni-Addolorata Hospital, Department of Internal Medicine, Cardiac Rehabilitation and Secondary Cardiovascular Prevention Unit. mureddu.gianfra@gmail.com.
Insights
Echocardiography is key for diagnosing heart failure (HF). Advanced measures like myocardial strain offer better insights than ejection fraction (EF) alone, improving HF assessment and patient prognosis.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Imaging
- Heart Failure Research
Background:
- Echocardiography is crucial for diagnosing heart failure (HF), with left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) being a primary metric.
- Limitations of EF include measurement variability and load-dependence, impacting its reliability in assessing contractile reserve.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore advanced echocardiographic methods beyond EF for HF assessment.
- To address the challenges in diagnosing HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) using current echocardiographic guidelines.
Main Methods:
- Evaluation of stroke volume, longitudinal function, and myocardial strain.
- Focus on echocardiographic recognition of diastolic dysfunction for HFpEF diagnosis.
Main Results:
- Advanced measures like myocardial strain can overcome EF limitations in assessing HF contractile reserve.
- Echocardiography is vital for identifying diastolic dysfunction, the basis for HFpEF diagnosis.
Conclusions:
- Stroke volume, longitudinal function, and myocardial strain provide a more comprehensive assessment of HF than EF alone.
- Improving the feasibility and standardization of multi-parametric echocardiography is essential for accurate HFpEF diagnosis and management.
Abstract:
The echocardiographic evaluation of left ventricular (LV) systolic function, and especially of ejection fraction (EF) plays a central role in the diagnosis of heart failure (HF) due to its undisputed prognostic value. Limitations of EF are substantially: i) the variability and reproducibility of measurements, and ii) the load-dependence. Measurement of stroke volume, longitudinal function and myocardial strain can overcome the limitations of EF in assessing the contractile reserve of patients with HF and may help to define both the phenotype and prognosis of the disease. The recognition of diastolic dysfunction (mainly by echocardiography) is the pathophysiological basis to make diagnosis of HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). The limitations are essentially related to its feasibility, since performing a multi-parametric quantitative echocardiographic evaluation, as indicated by the guidelines, may be difficult in clinical practice. Difficulties in method standardization, the poor attitude of cardiologists to test their reproducibility (test-retest, variability) favor the evaluation "at-a-glance" of LV structural and functional LV abnormalities.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Heart Failure I: Introduction
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Heart Failure Drugs: Diuretics
Heart Failure V: Medical Management

