Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 26, 2026

Taste Exam: A Brief and Validated Test
Published on: August 17, 2018
Validation of the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory Observational (CMAI-O) tool
Alys W Griffiths1, Christopher P Albertyn2, Natasha L Burnley1
1Centre for Dementia Research, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK.
Objectives:
Behaviours associated with agitation are common in people living with dementia. The Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI) is a 29-item scale widely used to assess agitation completed by a proxy (family carer or staff member). However, proxy informants introduce possible reporting bias when blinding to the treatment arm is not possible, and potential accuracy issues due to irregular contact between the proxy and the person with dementia over the reporting period. An observational measure completed by a blinded researcher may address these issues, but no agitation measures with comparable items exist.
Design:
Development and validation of an observational version of the CMAI (CMAI-O), to assess its validity as an alternative or complementary measure of agitation.
Setting:
Fifty care homes in England.
Participants:
Residents (N = 726) with dementia.
Measurements:
Two observational measures (CMAI-O and PAS) were completed by an independent researcher. Measures of agitation, functional status, and neuropsychiatric symptoms were completed with staff proxies.
Results:
The CMAI-O showed adequate internal consistency (α = .61), criterion validity with the PAS (r = .79, p = < .001), incremental validity in predicting quality of life beyond the Functional Assessment Staging of Alzheimer's disease (β = 1.83, p < .001 at baseline) and discriminant validity from the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Apathy subscale (r = .004, p = .902).
Conclusions:
The CMAI-O is a promising research tool for independently measuring agitation in people with dementia in care homes. Its use alongside the CMAI could provide a more robust understanding of agitation amongst residents with dementia.
Insights
Agitation in dementia is common. A new observational tool, the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory-Observational (CMAI-O), shows promise for accurate measurement, potentially improving care quality for individuals with dementia.
Area of Science:
- Gerontology
- Psychiatry
- Clinical Psychology
Background:
- Agitation is a frequent behavior in individuals with dementia.
- The Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI) is a proxy-reported scale, susceptible to bias and accuracy issues.
- There is a need for an observational measure of agitation comparable to the CMAI.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and validate an observational version of the CMAI (CMAI-O).
- To assess the CMAI-O's validity as an alternative or complementary measure for agitation in dementia.
Main Methods:
- Development of the CMAI-O, an observational tool.
- Validation study conducted in 726 residents with dementia across 50 care homes in England.
- Observational measures (CMAI-O, PAS) completed by blinded researchers; staff proxies completed other measures.
Main Results:
- The CMAI-O demonstrated adequate internal consistency (α = .61).
- Strong criterion validity was found with the PAS (r = .79, p < .001).
- The CMAI-O showed incremental validity in predicting quality of life and discriminant validity from apathy measures.
Conclusions:
- The CMAI-O is a valuable research tool for objective agitation assessment in dementia care settings.
- Utilizing the CMAI-O alongside the CMAI can enhance the understanding of agitation in dementia.
- This observational measure may improve the accuracy of agitation assessment in clinical research and practice.
More Related Videos
11:29Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools
Published on: June 20, 2020
10:39Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
Published on: August 29, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Techniques of therapeutic communication I: Active Listening, Sharing Observations, Validation, and Using Touch
Therapeutic communication is not the same as social interaction. Social interaction has no goal or purpose and consists of casual information sharing, whereas therapeutic communication has a plan or purpose for the conversation. Therapeutic...
Naturalistic Observations
Reliability and Validity
Data Validation
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
Data Validation
Key parameters for method validation include:
Actor-Observer Effect