Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 26, 2026

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Coronary Artery Revascularization
Published on: September 15, 2023
Effect of an Incentive Spirometer Patient Reminder After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Adam E M Eltorai1, Grayson L Baird1, Ashley Szabo Eltorai2
1Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
Insights
A reminder device for incentive spirometers (ISs) significantly improved patient adherence and reduced atelectasis, fever duration, and hospital stay after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery.
Area of Science:
- Pulmonary rehabilitation
- Post-surgical care
- Medical device technology
Background:
- Incentive spirometers (ISs) are crucial for preventing atelectasis post-surgery, but their effectiveness is limited by poor patient adherence.
- Lack of adherence data hinders the assessment of IS clinical utility.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the impact of a use-tracking IS reminder device on patient adherence and clinical outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery.
Main Methods:
- A randomized clinical trial involving 160 patients undergoing CABG, comparing an IS with an hourly reminder (bell on) to a standard IS (bell off).
- The study tracked IS usage, radiographic atelectasis severity, fever duration, ventilation use, and length of stay.
- Participants were stratified by surgical urgency and sex.
Main Results:
- The 'bell on' group demonstrated significantly higher IS adherence rates.
- This group also showed reduced final atelectasis severity scores, shorter fever duration, and decreased need for noninvasive positive pressure ventilation.
- Furthermore, the 'bell on' group experienced shorter intensive care unit (ICU) and overall hospital stays, with reduced 6-month mortality in nonelective cases.
Conclusions:
- An IS reminder device enhances patient adherence and improves key clinical outcomes following CABG surgery.
- The findings suggest that ISs are clinically effective when used appropriately, supported by adherence monitoring.
Importance:
Incentive spirometers (ISs) were developed to reduce atelectasis and are in widespread clinical use. However, without IS use adherence data, the effectiveness of IS cannot be determined.
Objective:
To evaluate the effect of a use-tracking IS reminder on patient adherence and clinical outcomes following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery.
Design, Setting, And Participants:
This randomized clinical trial was conducted from June 5, 2017, to December 29, 2017, at a tertiary referral teaching hospital and included 212 patients who underwent CABG, of whom 160 participants were randomized (intent to treat), with 145 completing the study per protocol. Participants were stratified by surgical urgency (elective vs nonelective) and sex (men vs women).
Interventions:
A use-tracking, IS add-on device (SpiroTimer) with an integrated use reminder bell recorded and timestamped participants' inspiratory breaths. Patients were randomized by hourly reminder "bell on" (experimental group) or "bell off" (control group).
Main Outcomes And Measures:
Incentive spirometer use was recorded for the entire postoperative stay and compared between groups. Radiographic atelectasis severity (score, 0-10) was the primary clinical outcome. Secondary respiratory and nonrespiratory outcomes were also evaluated.
Results:
A total of 145 per-protocol participants (112 men [77%]; mean age, 69 years [95% CI, 67-70]; 90 [62%] undergoing a nonelective procedure) were evaluated, with 74 (51.0%) in the bell off group and 71 (49.0%) in the bell on group. The baseline medical and motivation-to-recover characteristics of the 2 groups were similar. The mean number of daily inspiratory breaths was greater in bell on (35; 95% CI, 29-43 vs 17; 95% CI, 13-23; P < .001). The percentage of recorded hours with an inspiratory breath event was greater in bell on (58%; 95% CI, 51-65 vs 28%; 95% CI, 23-32; P < .001). Despite no differences in the first postoperative chest radiograph mean atelectasis severity scores (2.3; 95% CI, 2.0-2.6 vs 2.4; 95% CI, 2.2-2.7; P = .48), the mean atelectasis severity scores for the final chest radiographs conducted before discharge were significantly lower for bell on than bell off group (1.5; 95% CI, 1.3-1.8 vs 1.8; 95% CI, 1.6-2.1; P = .04). Of those with early postoperative fevers, fever duration was shorter for bell on (3.2 hours; 95% CI, 2.3-4.6 vs 5.2 hours; 95% CI, 3.9-7.0; P = .04). Having the bell turned on reduced noninvasive positive pressure ventilation use rates (37.2%; 95% CI, 24.1%-52.5% vs 19.2%; 95% CI, 10.2%-33.0%; P = .03) for participants undergoing nonelective procedures. Bell on reduced the median postoperative length of stay (7 days; 95% CI, 6-9 vs 6 days; 95% CI, 6-7; P = .048) and the intensive care unit length of stay for patients undergoing nonelective procedures (4 days; 95% CI, 3-5 vs 3 days; 95% CI, 3-4; P = .02). At 6 months, the bell off mortality rate was higher than bell on (9% vs 0%, P = .048) for participants undergoing nonelective procedures.
Conclusions And Relevance:
The incentive spirometer reminder improved patient adherence, atelectasis severity, early postoperative fever duration, noninvasive positive pressure ventilation use, ICU and length of stay, and 6-month mortality in certain patients. With the reminder, IS appears to be clinically effective when used appropriately.
Trial Registration:
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02952027.
More Related Videos
09:12Surgical Swine Model of Chronic Cardiac Ischemia Treated by Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
Published on: March 27, 2018
12:00Evaluation of a Novel Laser-assisted Coronary Anastomotic Connector - the Trinity Clip - in a Porcine Off-pump Bypass Model
Published on: November 24, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Coronary Artery Disease III: Clinical Manifestations
Clinical Trials: Overview
Coronary Artery Disease I: Introduction
Coronary Artery Disease II: Pathophysiology
Statistical Software for Data Analysis and Clinical Trials