Related Experiment Videos
Speech-Language Pathologists' Clinical Decision Making for Children With Specific Language Impairment
Claire M Selin1, Mabel L Rice1, Teresa Girolamo1
1Child Language Doctoral Program, The University of Kansas, Lawrence.
Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools
|April 11, 2019
Summary
Speech-language pathologists (SLPs) are crucial for children with specific language impairment (SLI). This study found child characteristics, not SLP traits, influenced decisions, highlighting a need for better SLI identification and support.
Area of Science:
- Communication Sciences and Disorders
- Clinical Linguistics
- Developmental Psychology
Background:
- Specific Language Impairment (SLI) affects many children, yet they are often underrepresented in caseloads.
- SLPs play a vital role in providing specialized intervention for underlying deficits in children with SLI.
- Long-term impacts of untreated SLI necessitate effective clinical decision-making by SLPs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore how speech-language pathologists (SLPs) utilize research to inform clinical decision-making for individuals with Specific Language Impairment (SLI).
- To investigate the influence of child and practitioner characteristics on SLP clinical decisions regarding assessment and intervention for SLI.
- To examine SLP decision-making processes for SLI under neutral workplace conditions, removing potential confounds.
Main Methods:
- A national web-based survey was distributed to 563 SLPs.
- Vignettes depicting various clinical profiles of SLI were used to assess clinical decisions.
- Respondents made decisions on service recommendation, delivery, intervention content, goals, and monitoring under controlled conditions.
Main Results:
- Significant variation was observed in SLP clinical decisions across different SLI vignettes.
- Child characteristics, rather than practitioner characteristics, strongly influenced SLP decision-making.
- Standard scores and percentiles from assessments were most closely linked to SLP service recommendations for SLI.
Conclusions:
- The vignette methodology proved effective for studying clinical decision-making in communication sciences and disorders.
- SLPs recommended services for SLI at higher rates in this study than typically observed in practice.
- Implications suggest removing workplace constraints and enhancing SLP competency in identifying SLI diagnostic profiles.