Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 26, 2026

Improving Student Outcomes with an Adaptable Molecular Cloning Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experience
Published on: November 15, 2024
Effects of different classroom temperatures on cardiac autonomic control and cognitive performances in undergraduate
F Barbic1,2,3, M Minonzio1, B Cairo4
1Department of Internal Medicine, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy.
Objective:
Indoor microclimate may affect students' wellbeing, cardiac autonomic control and cognitive performance with potential impact on learning capabilities. To assess the effects of classroom temperature variations on the autonomic profile and students' cognitive capabilities.
Approach:
Twenty students attending Humanitas University School, (14M, age 21 ± 3 years) underwent a single-lead ECG continuous recording by a portable device during a 2 h lecture when classroom temperature was set 'neutral' (20 °C-22 °C, Day 1) and when classroom temperature was set to 24 °C-26 °C (Day 2). ECGs were sent by telemetry to a server for off-line analysis. Spectral analysis of RR variability provided indices of cardiac sympathetic (LFnu), vagal (HF, HFnu) and cardiac sympatho-vagal modulation (LF/HF). Symbolic analysis of RR variability provided the percentage of sequences of three heart periods with no significant change in RR interval (0V%) and with two significant variations (2V%) reflecting cardiac sympathetic and vagal modulation, respectively. Students' cognitive performance (memory, verbal comprehension and reasoning) was assessed at the end of each lecture using the Cambridge Brain Sciences cognitive evaluation tool.
Main Results:
Classroom temperature and CO2 were assessed every 5 min. Classroom temperatures were 22.4 °C ± 0.1 °C (Day 1) and 26.2 °C ± 0.1 °C (Day 2). Student's thermal comfort was lower during Day 2 compared to Day 1. HR, LF/HF and 0V% were greater during Day 2 (79.5 ± 12.1 bpm, 6.9 ± 7.1 and 32.8% ± 10.3%) than during Day 1 (72.6 ± 10.8 bpm, 3.4 ± 3.7, 21.4% ± 9.2%). Conversely, 2V% was lower during Day 2 (23.1% ± 8.1%) than during Day 1 (32.3% ± 11.4%). Short-term memory, verbal ability and the overall cognitive C-score scores were lower during Day 2 (10.3 ± 0.3; 8.1 ± 1.2 and 10.9 ± 2.0) compared to Day 1 (11.7 ± 2.1; 10.7 ± 1.7 and 12.6 ± 1.8).
Significance:
During Day 2, a shift of the cardiac autonomic control towards a sympathetic predominance was observed compared to Day 1, in the presence of greater thermal discomfort. Furthermore, during Day 2 reduced cognitive performances were found.
More Related Videos
07:32Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity
Published on: February 10, 2016
08:53Using a Classroom-Based Deese Roediger McDermott Paradigm to Assess the Effects of Imagery on False Memories
Published on: November 14, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Effects of Temperature on Free Energy
Pathophysiology of Cardiac Performance
Atomic Spectroscopy: Effects of Temperature
At thermal equilibrium, the relative populations of excited and ground state atoms can be estimated using the Maxwell–Boltzmann distribution. For example, an increase in temperature...
Cognitive Dissonance
Physical Methods for Controlling Microbial Growth: Temperature
Student t Distribution
The Student t distribution was developed by William S. Goset (1876–1937) of the...