Clinical implementation of respiratory-gated spot-scanning proton therapy: An efficiency analysis of active motion
Edgar Gelover1, Amanda J Deisher1, Michael G Herman1
1Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, USA.
Purpose:
The aim of this work is to describe the clinical implementation of respiratory-gated spot-scanning proton therapy (SSPT) for the treatment of thoracic and abdominal moving targets. The experience of our institution is summarized, from initial acceptance and commissioning tests to the development of standard clinical operating procedures for simulation, motion assessment, motion mitigation, treatment planning, and gated SSPT treatment delivery.
Materials And Methods:
A custom respiratory gating interface incorporating the Real-Time Position Management System (RPM, Varian Medical Systems, Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA) was developed in-house for our synchrotron-based delivery system. To assess gating performance, a motion phantom and radiochromic films were used to compare gated vs nongated delivery. Site-specific treatment planning protocols and conservative motion cutoffs were developed, allowing for free-breathing (FB), breath-holding (BH), or phase-gating (Ph-G). Room usage efficiency of BH and Ph-G treatments was retrospectively evaluated using beam delivery data retrieved from our record and verify system and DICOM files from patient-specific quality assurance (QA) procedures.
Results:
More than 70 patients were treated using active motion management between the launch of our motion mitigation program in October 2015 and the end date of data collection of this study in January 2018. During acceptance procedures, we found that overall system latency is clinically-suitable for Ph-G. Regarding room usage efficiency, the average number of energy layers delivered per minute was <10 for Ph-G, 10-15 for BH and ≥15 for FB, making Ph-G the slowest treatment modality. When comparing to continuous delivery measured during pretreatment QA procedures, the median values of BH treatment time were extended from 6.6 to 9.3 min (+48%). Ph-G treatments were extended from 7.3 to 13.0 min (+82%).
Conclusions:
Active motion management has been crucial to the overall success of our SSPT program. Nevertheless, our conservative approach has come with an efficiency cost that is more noticeable in Ph-G treatments and should be considered in decision-making.
Related Concept Videos
01:24Absolute Motion Analysis- General Plane Motion
As the drone's propellers rotate, an upward force is generated that counteracts the force of gravity, enabling the drone to lift off from the ground. This initial movement of the drone is along a straight path, representing a form of translational motion. In this phase, every point on the...
01:28Esophageal Perforation-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
Clinical Manifestations:
01:21Barrett Esophagus-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
To diagnose Barrett's esophagus, healthcare providers often recommend an endoscopy for those showing symptoms of acid reflux. The procedure...
01:28Esophageal Varices-II: Clinical Features and Management
In the initial assessment, a thorough review of the patient's medical history is vital to identify risk factors such as liver disease, alcohol...
01:23Gastritis III: Clinical Manifestations and Management
Clinical manifestations of acute gastritis
The patient with acute gastritis may have a rapid onset of symptoms, such as epigastric pain or discomfort, dyspepsia, anorexia, hiccups, or nausea and vomiting, which can last from a few hours to a few days. Erosive or hemorrhagic gastritis may cause bleeding, which may manifest as blood in vomit or as...
01:26Esophageal Strictures-II: Clinical Features and Management
Healthcare providers should gather a comprehensive medical history and conduct a physical examination for diagnosis. If esophageal stricture is...