Confounding Factors in the Interpretation of Preclinical Studies
Laura Dill Morton1, Martin Sanders2, William J Reagan3
11 Aclairo Pharmaceutical Development Group Inc, Vienna, VA, USA.
Abstract:
A number of issues may arise during the conduct of a study which can complicate interpretation of in vitro and in vivo datasets. Speakers discussed the implications of differing interpretations and how to avoid complicating factors during study planning and execution. Consideration needs to be given to study design factors including defining objectives, consideration of expected pharmacological effects, dose selection and drug kinetics, species used, and vehicle selection. In addition, the effects of vivarium temperature effects on various endpoints, how to control variables affecting clinical pathology, and how early death animals, common background findings, and artifacts can affect histopathology interpretation all play into the final interpretation of study data.
Related Concept Videos
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Interpreting R Charts
An R chart plots the range of subsets of measurements collected from a process. Each point on the chart represents the range—defined as the difference between the maximum and minimum...
Interpreting Run Charts
Mass Spectrum: Interpretation
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...


