Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 26, 2026

Vegetated Treatment Systems for Removing Contaminants Associated with Surface Water Toxicity in Agriculture and Urban Runoff
Published on: May 15, 2017
Stormwater runoff treatment filtration system and backwashing system
1Division of Civil, Environmental & Urban-Transportation Engineering, Korea National University of Transportation, 50 University Road, Chungju, Chungbuk, 27469, Korea
Abstract:
This study has been carried out to evaluate the applicability of the pilot scale hybrid type of stormwater runoff treatment system for treatment of combined sewer overflow. Also, to determine the optimum operation parameter such as coagulation dosage concentration, effectiveness of coagulant usage, surface loading rate and backwashing conditions. The pilot scale stormwater filtration system (SFS) was installed at the municipal wastewater plant serving the city of Cheongju (CWTP), Korea. CWTP has a capacity of 280,000 m3/day. The SFS consists of a hydrocyclone coagulation/flocculation with polyaluminium chloride silicate (PACS) and an upflow filter to treat combined sewer overflows. There are two modes (without PACS use and with PACS use) of operation for the SFS. In case of no coagulant use, the range of suspended solids (SS) and turbidity removal efficiency were 72.0-86.6% (mean 80.0%) and 30.9-71.1% (mean 49.3%), respectively. And, the recovery rate of filter was 79.2-83.6% (mean 81.2%); the rate of remaining solid loading in filter media was 16.4-20.8% (mean 18.8%) after backwashing. The influent turbidity, SS concentrations were 59.0-90.7 NTU (mean 72.0 NTU), 194.0-320.0 mg/L (mean 246.7 mg/L), respectively. The range of PACS dosage concentration was 6.0-7.1 mg/L (mean 6.7 mg/L). The range of SS and turbidity removal efficiency was 84.9-98.2 (mean 91.4%) and 70.7-96.3 (mean 84.0%), respectively. It was found that removal efficiency was enhanced with PACS dosage. The recovery rate of filter was 92.0-92.5% (mean 92.3%) the rate of remaining solid loading in filter media was 6.1-8.2% (mean 7.2%) after backwashing. In the case of coagulant use, the particle size of the effluent is bigger than influent particle size. The results showed that SFS with PACS use more effective than without PACS use in SS and turbidity removal efficiency and recovery rate of filter.
Related Concept Videos
Filtration and Urine Formation
Glomerular Filtration: Net Filtration Pressure
GBHP, with an average value of 55 mmHg, promotes filtration by pushing water and solutes through the filtration membrane. This is balanced by two opposing forces: CHP, a "back pressure" exerted against the filtration membrane by fluid already in the capsular space and renal...
Filtration
Glomerular Filtration
Components of the Filtration Membrane
The filtration process involves three key layers: the glomerular endothelial cells, the basement membrane, and the podocyte-formed filtration slits.
Glomerular Filtration Rate and its Regulation
GFR regulation involves two primary intrinsic controls: the myogenic and tubuloglomerular feedback mechanisms.
The myogenic...
Renal Drug Excretion: Glomerular Filtration
Drugs gain access to the kidney via the renal artery, which progressively branches off into afferent arterioles....

