Comparison of Surgisis, Vypro II and TiMesh in contaminated and clean field

J Filipović-Čugura1, Z Misir1, P Hrabač2

  • 1Department of Surgery, Sestre Milosrdnice University Hospital Center, Vinogradska cesta 29, 10000, Zagreb, Croatia.

Abstract

Insights

Infection resistance of surgical meshes (Surgisis, Vypro II, TiMesh) was evaluated in a rat model. Surgisis showed increased inflammation and infection signs, offering no benefits over Vypro II and TiMesh when contaminated.

Area of Science:

  • Biomaterials science
  • Surgical innovation
  • Infection control in surgery

Background:

  • Surgical mesh materials are crucial for hernia repair and tissue reinforcement.
  • Understanding mesh properties, including infection resistance and host response, is vital for patient outcomes.
  • Different mesh types, such as biological, composite, and non-resorbing, exhibit varied biocompatibility and performance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the histologic properties and infection resistance of three distinct surgical mesh materials: Surgisis, Vypro II, and TiMesh.
  • To compare the host response, including inflammation and foreign body reaction, to these meshes in both infectious and non-infectious settings.
  • To assess the efficacy of different mesh types in preventing infection under bacterial contamination.

Main Methods:

  • A rat model was used to implant three mesh types (Surgisis, Vypro II, TiMesh) in sublay and onlay positions.
  • Animals were divided into infectious and non-infectious groups, with samples collected at 7, 21, and 90 days post-implantation.
  • Histologic parameters evaluated included inflammation, vascularization, fibrosis, collagen formation, cell proliferation (Ki67), and foreign body granuloma formation.

Main Results:

  • Surgisis mesh induced more significant inflammation, cell proliferation, and less fibrosis compared to Vypro II and TiMesh.
  • In the presence of infection, the Surgisis group exhibited a higher incidence of local infection signs.
  • No significant difference in infection resistance was observed between Surgisis, Vypro II, and TiMesh when bacterial contamination was present.

Conclusions:

  • Surgisis mesh demonstrated a more pronounced inflammatory response and increased susceptibility to infection compared to Vypro II and TiMesh.
  • When bacterial contamination is a concern, Surgisis mesh offers no discernible advantage over Vypro II and TiMesh.
  • The choice of mesh material should consider its performance in infectious conditions to optimize surgical outcomes.

Related Concept Videos

Cleaning, Sterilization, and Disinfection01:30

Cleaning, Sterilization, and Disinfection

Cleaning, disinfection, and sterilization are the methods that help to break the infection chain and prevent disease.
Cleaning
The cleaning process usually involves using water with detergents or enzymatic cleaner and removing foreign material from objects and surfaces, including organic material such as body fluids or inorganic material like soil. Cleaning is performed before high-level disinfection and sterilization because foreign materials on the cover of the devices interfere with process...
9.7K
Contaminants and Errors01:16

Contaminants and Errors

Effective sample preparation is crucial for accurate and reliable laboratory analysis. During this process, two significant sources of error can arise: concentration bias from improper sample splitting and contamination caused by methods used to reduce particle size, such as grinding or homogenization. Identifying and minimizing these potential errors is crucial to ensuring the validity of the analysis.
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
354
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison02:57

The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison

According to Charles Cooley, we base our image on what we think other people see (Cooley 1902). We imagine how we must appear to others, then react to this speculation. We don certain clothes, prepare our hair in a particular manner, wear makeup, use cologne, and the like—all with the notion that our presentation of ourselves is going to affect how others perceive us. We expect a certain reaction, and, if lucky, we get the one we desire and feel good about it. But more than that, Cooley...
55.6K
Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
4.4K
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons02:54

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

Genome comparison is one of the excellent ways to interpret the evolutionary relationships between organisms. The basic principle of genome comparison is that if two species share a common feature, it is likely encoded by the DNA sequence conserved between both species. The advent of genome sequencing technologies in the late 20th century enabled scientists to understand the concept of conservation of domains between species and helped them to deduce evolutionary relationships across diverse...
6.9K
Comparison Between Electrical And Gravitational Forces01:24

Comparison Between Electrical And Gravitational Forces

There are four fundamental forces in nature: the gravitational force, the electromagnetic force, the strong nuclear force, and the weak nuclear force. To compare the numerical strengths of the first two, take two particles of the same kind. Since electrons are fundamental particles, they are a good example.
Since both are inverse square law forces, the distance gets canceled when the ratio of the two forces is considered. Instead, the ratio of the electrical and gravitational forces depends on...
4.0K