Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 26, 2026

Assessment of Social Transmission of Food Preferences Behaviors
Published on: January 25, 2018
Exploring University Food Environment and On-Campus Food Purchasing Behaviors, Preferences, and Opinions
Rajshri Roy1, Danielle Soo1, Denise Conroy2
1Discipline of Nutrition and Dietetics, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Objective:
Cross-sectional observation of a university food environment and a survey of food purchasing preferences, behaviors, and opinions of students and staff to formulate strategies for interventions.
Design:
A modified food environment-quality index was used to assess food outlets. A cross-sectional survey with closed (n = 42) and open-ended (n = 2) questions assessing students and staff purchasing, choice determinants, and opinions about the food environment.
Setting:
Six campuses of 1 large urban university.
Participants:
Food outlets (eg, convenience stores, restaurant and café, takeout, vending machines) (n = 57). University students and staff (n = 1,954).
Analysis:
The researchers calculated descriptive statistics and Pearson chi-square tests to compare the percentages of healthy and/or unhealthy products in high- vs low-scoring outlets. Kruskal-Wallis H test was used to determine differences in healthiness between outlet types. Pearson chi-square tests were used to examine the influence of gender, and student and staff differences in survey responses.
Results:
Median food environment-quality index was 79 out of 199 (interquartile range = 7). Six food outlets were categorized as healthy and 2 as unhealthy; the rest were intermediate. Overall, healthy items were less available, accessible, and promoted and cost more than unhealthy items. The majority of respondents in the survey (79%) purchased food and beverages on campus; males consuming them more frequently than did females (P = .001) and students consumed them more frequently than did staff (P = .001). Value for money, healthfulness, and taste determined the choice. Respondents suggested increasing value for money and healthy options.
Conclusions And Implications:
Interventions that improve food availability, accessibility, prices, and promotions through policies are warranted and would be well-received among both university students and staff.
Related Concept Videos
Regulation of Food Intake
Microorganisms in Agriculture and Food industry
Pharmacokinetics: Drug–Food and Drug–Viral Interactions
What is Behavior?
Gene-Environment Interactions
Natural Selection and Mating Preferences
Females, due to their biological roles in conception, pregnancy, and nursing,...

