Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 26, 2026

Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness and Safety of Shugan Jieyu Capsules for the Treatment of Insomnia
Published on: February 17, 2023
The comparative efficacy and safety of herpes zoster vaccines: A network meta-analysis
Ashleigh McGirr1, Robyn Widenmaier1, Desmond Curran2
1GSK Canada, 7333 Mississauga Rd N, Mississauga, ON L5N 6L4, Canada.
Background:
We estimated the relative efficacy and safety of vaccines for prevention of herpes zoster (HZ) using network meta-analysis (NMA) based on evidence from randomized controlled trials.
Methods:
A systematic literature review evaluated two different HZ vaccines: adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV) and zoster vaccine live (ZVL), with different formulations assessed. Detailed feasibility assessment indicated that a NMA was feasible for efficacy (incidence of HZ and postherpetic neuralgia [PHN]) and safety (serious adverse events [SAE] and reactogenicity [injection-site reactions, systemic reaction]) outcomes. Primary analyses included frequentist NMAs with fixed effects for efficacy outcomes, due to limited data availability, and both fixed and random effects for safety and reactogenicity outcomes. As age is a known effect modifier of vaccine efficacy (VE), VE analyses were stratified by age.
Results:
RZV demonstrated significantly higher HZ efficacy than ZVL in adults ≥60 years of age (YOA) (VERZV = 0.92 (95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 0.88, 0.94), VEZVL = 0.51 (95%CI: 0.44, 0.57)) and adults ≥70 YOA (VERZV = 0.91 (95%CI: 0.87, 0.94), VEZVL = 0.37 (95%CI: 0.25, 0.48)). Similarly, RZV demonstrated significantly higher PHN efficacy than ZVL in adults ≥60 YOA (VERZV = 0.89 (95%CI: 0.70, 0.96), VEZVL = 0.66 (95%CI: 0.48, 0.78)) and adults ≥70 YOA (VERZV = 0.89 (95%CI: 0.69, 0.96), VEZVL = 0.67 (95%CI: 0.44, 0.80)). RZV was associated with significantly more injection-site and systemic reactions compared to most formulations of ZVL and placebo, however definitions and data collection procedures differed across the included studies. There were no statistically significant differences found between RZV and any formulation of ZVL or placebo for SAEs.
Conclusion:
RZV is significantly more effective in reducing HZ and PHN incidence in adults ≥60 YOA, compared with ZVL. As anticipated with an adjuvanted vaccine, RZV results in more reactogenicity following immunization. No differences in SAEs were found between RZV and ZVL.
More Related Videos
08:36Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
Published on: April 19, 2024
06:26Author Spotlight: Optimizing CFU Determination for Efficient Assessment of TB Vaccine Efficacy and Antigen Presentation Analysis
Published on: July 28, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Vaccinations
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Survey Safety
Protein Networks
These interactions can be represented through maps depicting protein-protein interaction networks, represented as nodes and edges. Nodes are circles that are representative of a protein,...
Self-Efficacy
Directing Effect of Substituents: meta-Directing Groups