Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 26, 2026

Intraoperative Assessment of Resection Margins in Oral Cavity Cancer: This is the Way
Published on: May 10, 2021
Resection margins obtained with patient-specific instruments for resecting primary pelvic bone sarcomas: A
Robin Evrard1, Thomas Schubert1, Laurent Paul2
1Neuro Musculo-Skeletal Laboratory (NMSK), secteur des sciences de la santé, institut de recherche expérimentale et clinique, université catholique de Louvain, avenue Mounier 53, 1200 Brussels, Belgium; Service d'orthopédie et de traumatologie de l'appareil locomoteur, cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, avenue Hippocrate 10, 1200 Brussels, Belgium; Cancérologie et hématologie, institut Roi-Albert-II, cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, avenue Hippocrate 10, 1200 Brussels, Belgium.
Patient-specific instruments (PSIs) significantly reduced local recurrence rates in pelvic bone sarcoma surgery. This study found no PSIs-guided resections recurred, compared to 7 controls, demonstrating improved tumor-free margins.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Oncology
- Surgical Oncology
- Medical Device Technology
Background:
- Limb salvage surgery for pelvic bone sarcoma has a high risk of local recurrence.
- Patient-specific instruments (PSIs) show potential for achieving tumor-free resection margins.
- Medium-term outcomes of PSI-guided resections for pelvic sarcomas are not well-documented.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate if PSI-guided resection reduces local recurrence rates in pelvic bone sarcoma.
- To determine if PSI-guided resection shortens operative time.
- To assess the quality of allograft reconstruction following PSI-guided resection.
Main Methods:
- A case-control study comparing 9 patients undergoing PSI-guided resection with 19 historical controls.
- Analysis of local recurrence rates, operative times, and resection margin status (R0, R1, R2).
- Assessment of allograft reconstruction quality in patients who received them.
Main Results:
- No local recurrences were observed in the PSI-guided group (0/9) versus 7/19 in the control group (p=0.03) after a mean follow-up of 52 months.
- Bone resection margins were R0 in 8/9 PSI-guided cases, compared to R0 in 13/19 controls (p=0.47).
- Mean operative times were similar between groups (612 min for PSI vs. 633 min for controls, p=0.87).
Conclusions:
- PSI-guided resection is associated with a significantly lower local recurrence rate in primary pelvic bone sarcomas.
- PSIs improve resection accuracy, leading to a higher rate of R0 bone margins.
- PSI-guided surgery is effective for achieving tumor-free margins and satisfactory allograft reconstruction in complex pelvic sarcoma cases.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Margin of Error
Instrument Transformers
Instrument Calibration
Analytical Balance Calibration
An analytical balance measures mass and requires regular calibration to...
Instrumentation Amplifier
To overcome this challenge, an ECG machine utilizes an instrumentation amplifier. This specialized amplifier is...
Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments

