Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 26, 2026

A DNA/Ki67-Based Flow Cytometry Assay for Cell Cycle Analysis of Antigen-Specific CD8 T Cells in Vaccinated Mice
Published on: January 5, 2021
Ki67 Quantitative Interpretation: Insights using Image Analysis
Zoya Volynskaya1,2, Ozgur Mete1,2, Sara Pakbaz1,2
1Department of Pathology, Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Digital image analysis offers accurate and fast Ki67 quantification for neuroendocrine tumors. However, variations in region selection can impact tumor grading, necessitating standardization for reliable results.
Area of Science:
- Digital Pathology
- Oncology
- Quantitative Analysis
Background:
- Ki67 is a crucial proliferation marker for cancer diagnosis and prognosis.
- Current methods for Ki67 quantification are debated, impacting clinical decisions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate an automated image analysis tool for Ki67 quantification in neuroendocrine tumors.
- To compare the accuracy and efficiency of digital analysis against manual counting.
Main Methods:
- A Leica digital pathology platform with a nuclear algorithm was used.
- Tumor regions of interest (ROIs) were analyzed by the algorithm and manually by pathologists.
- The impact of ROI size and number on Ki67 counts was assessed.
Main Results:
- The algorithm provided rapid and reproducible Ki67 results, significantly faster than manual counting.
- Users reported improved accuracy, time savings, and ease of use with the digital tool.
- Variations in ROI selection and cell counts influenced Ki67 results around critical cutoffs for tumor grading.
Conclusions:
- Digital image analysis offers a faster, more accurate method for Ki67 quantification.
- Standardization of cell number and ROI selection is crucial to avoid clinically significant variations in grading.
- This highlights the risks of relying on fixed cutoffs for continuous variables like Ki67.
More Related Videos
10:09Transferring Cognitive Tasks Between Brain Imaging Modalities: Implications for Task Design and Results Interpretation in fMRI Studies
Published on: September 22, 2014
05:50Author Spotlight: Point-of-Care Ultrasound for Gastric Content Assessment and Risk Stratification in Perioperative Care
Published on: September 22, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Quantitative Analysis
In quantitative analysis, two key measurements are made: the sample quantity and a property proportional to the amount of the analyte (the substance being analyzed). This forms the basis of the...
Interpreting R Charts
An R chart plots the range of subsets of measurements collected from a process. Each point on the chart represents the range—defined as the difference between the maximum and minimum...
Interpreting Run Charts
Mass Spectrum: Interpretation
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
Interpreting X̄ Charts
An x̄ chart plots the values of individual measurements over time against control limits calculated from historical data. The central line...