Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 29, 2026

Assessing Working Memory in Children: The Comprehensive Assessment Battery for Children – Working Memory (CABC-WM)
Published on: June 12, 2017
Evaluating Pediatric Cochlear Implant Users' Encoding, Storage, and Retrieval Strategies in Verbal Working Memory
Angela M AuBuchon1, David B Pisoni2, William G Kronenberger3
1Boys Town National Research Hospital, Omaha, NE.
Working memory differences in pediatric cochlear implant (CI) users are linked to encoding and retrieval, not just storage. Vocabulary and naming speed are key factors for both CI users and hearing peers.
Area of Science:
- Auditory Neuroscience
- Cognitive Psychology
- Developmental Psychology
Background:
- Pediatric cochlear implant (CI) use impacts auditory processing and cognitive functions.
- Working memory, crucial for learning, involves distinct stages: encoding, storage, and retrieval.
- Understanding these components in CI users is vital for targeted interventions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically examine the contributions of encoding, storage, and retrieval to working memory in pediatric CI users.
- To compare working memory component performance between long-term CI users and typically hearing children.
- To identify specific cognitive processes underlying working memory differences.
Main Methods:
- Forty-nine pediatric CI users and 56 typically hearing controls completed forward and backward span tasks using digits, pictures, and symbols.
- Phonological recoding speed was measured by rapid digit naming.
- Phonological storage was assessed via nonword repetition, and retrieval via vocabulary knowledge (Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test).
Main Results:
- Rapid digit naming speed and vocabulary knowledge significantly correlated with short-term and working memory span in both groups.
- Nonword repetition (phonological storage) only contributed to short-term memory models.
- Individual differences in encoding and retrieval explained significant working memory variability in both CI users and controls.
Conclusions:
- Working memory differences between pediatric CI users and typically hearing peers are primarily associated with encoding and retrieval processes.
- Phonological storage (nonword repetition) plays a limited role in explaining these working memory variations.
- Cognitive interventions for CI users should focus on enhancing encoding and retrieval strategies.
More Related Videos
06:04Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
Published on: March 24, 2023
07:00Electrically Evoked Stapedius Reflex Measurements in Cochlear Implantation and Its Application in the Postoperative Fitting Process
Published on: June 21, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Working Memory
Chunking and Rehearsal in Sensory Memory