Related Concept Videos
Testing a Claim about Mean: Known Population SD
Estimating a population mean requires the samples to be distributed normally. The data should be collected from the randomly selected samples having no sampling bias. The sample size needed to be higher than 30, and most importantly, the population standard deviation should be already known.
In most realistic situations, the population standard deviation is often unknown, but in rare circumstances, when it...
Tumor Immunotherapy
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
Testing a Claim about Mean: Unknown Population SD
Estimating a population mean requires the samples to be approximately normally distributed. The data should be collected from the randomly selected samples having no sampling bias. There is no specific requirement for sample size. But if the sample size is less than 30, and we don't know the population standard deviation, a different approach is used;...
You might also read
Related Articles
Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.
T cell-associated immunity induced by heterologous recombinant BCG and purified protein vaccination confers cross-variant protection against SARS-CoV-2.
Post-vaccination HPV prevalence, genotype distribution, and associated factors among vaccinated women in China: A cross-sectional study.
Economic and epidemiological burden of HPV-related diseases in the Czech Republic: A claims database analysis.
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 26, 2026

Manufacturing Chimeric Antigen Receptor CAR T Cells for Adoptive Immunotherapy
Published on: December 17, 2019
Drafting eligible biotech and immunotherapy claims.
1Division of Experimental Surgery, Department of Surgery and Rehabilitation and Technical Aids Center, Taipei Veterans General Hospital; Institute of Hospital and Health Care Administration, National Yang-Ming University, Tiapei, Taiwan, Taiwan.
Recent court decisions impact patent eligibility for innovations like biomarkers and diagnostics. This study offers a flowchart to navigate patent law, guiding inventors toward patentable subject matter by avoiding natural laws and abstract ideas.
Area of Science:
- Biotechnology
- Intellectual Property Law
- Medical Diagnostics
Background:
- Recent US Supreme Court and Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) rulings have significantly altered patent eligibility standards.
- Groundbreaking innovations in biomarkers, diagnostic methods, and personalized cancer immunotherapy face patent ineligibility challenges.
- This evolving legal landscape necessitates clear guidelines for patent protection in life sciences.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze CAFC patent eligibility cases and develop a decision-making flowchart.
- To provide strategic guidance for securing patent protection for biotechnological innovations.
- To address the impact of recent case law on diagnostic and immunotherapy patents.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of all relevant CAFC patent eligibility decisions.
- Development of a flowchart based on judicial precedents.
- Identification of claim drafting strategies to overcome eligibility rejections.
Main Results:
- Inventions must avoid categories of natural law, natural phenomena, or abstract ideas to be patent-eligible.
- Strategies such as claiming non-natural cDNA, including cell growth steps, or using means clauses may enhance eligibility.
- Claims with substantive limitations, excluding well-understood, routine, or conventional activities, are theoretically eligible but lack successful CAFC precedent.
Conclusions:
- The developed flowchart serves as a practical guideline for assessing patent eligibility.
- Inventors and legal professionals can utilize these guidelines to draft stronger patent claims.
- Navigating patent eligibility requires careful consideration of judicial interpretations and strategic claim construction.

