Related Experiment Videos
Screening for Housing Instability: Providers' Reflections on Addressing a Social Determinant of Health
Manik Chhabra1, Anneliese E Sorrentino2, Meagan Cusack2
1U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Department of Medicine at the Cpl. Michael Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Background:
The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) has a long history of addressing social determinants of health, including housing. In 2012, the VA integrated a two-question Homelessness Screening Clinical Reminder (HSCR) into the electronic medical record in outpatient clinics to identify Veterans experiencing housing instability and ensure referral to appropriate services.
Objective:
This study explores perspectives of VA clinical providers regarding administration of the HSCR, their role in addressing housing status, and how a patient's housing status impacts clinical decision-making.
Design:
We conducted a qualitative study using in-depth semi-structured interviewing.
Participants:
Twenty-two providers were interviewed (20 physicians and two nurse practitioners) between March and September 2016.
Approach:
Interviews were conducted with Veterans Health Administration (VHA) physician and non-physician practitioners who had administered the HSCR and documented at least five positive screens between 2013 and 2015. Our interview guide investigated provider experiences with administering the HSCR and addressing affirmative responses. The guide also elicited details about how patients' housing instability was identified (if at all) prior to implementation of the screening reminder, and how practices changed following implementation of the HSCR. Transcripts were analyzed using a modified grounded theory approach.
Key Results:
Providers reported that the HSCR prompted them to incorporate patient housing status into routine assessment, which they typically did not do prior to its implementation. Providers discussed adverse impacts of housing instability on patients' overall health and described how they factored patients' housing instability into clinical decision-making. Although providers viewed the health system as having an important role in addressing housing concerns, there were mixed opinions on whether it was the role of providers to directly administer the screening.
Conclusions:
Integration of a screener for housing instability into the electronic medical record increased provider attention to housing instability into the social history, and positive responses commonly impacted plans of care.