Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 26, 2026

Myocardial Infarction and Functional Outcome Assessment in Pigs
Published on: April 25, 2014
Critical analysis of the classic indications for myocardial revascularization
Diogo Freitas Cardoso de Azevedo1, Eduardo Gomes Lima1, Matheus de Oliveira Laterza Ribeiro1
1Department of Atherosclerosis, Heart Institute of the Hospital das Clínicas of the Faculty of Medicine of USP (InCor-HCFMUSP), São Paulo, Brasil.
Insights
This review examines revascularization for stable coronary artery disease (CAD), analyzing classic and recent evidence. It questions long-standing guidelines for revascularization in CAD patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Clinical Guidelines
Background:
- Stable coronary artery disease (CAD) treatment focuses on prognosis and symptom relief.
- Current guidelines recommend revascularization for symptomatic patients refractory to optimal medical treatment or with prognostic benefit.
- Evidence supporting these guidelines largely originates from 1970s-1990s studies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To critically analyze the established indications for revascularization in stable CAD.
- To review the historical evidence base for CAD revascularization guidelines.
- To incorporate findings from recent studies, including the ORBITA trial, into the assessment.
Main Methods:
- Literature review of seminal and contemporary studies on coronary artery disease revascularization.
- Critical analysis of evidence supporting guideline indications for revascularization.
- Examination of studies from the 1970s to recent trials like ORBITA.
Main Results:
- Classic indications for revascularization in stable CAD are based on older evidence.
- Recent studies, such as ORBITA, have challenged the established benefits of revascularization in certain patient groups.
- A re-evaluation of revascularization indications in light of new evidence is warranted.
Conclusions:
- The evidence base for current coronary artery disease revascularization guidelines requires updating.
- Revascularization decisions in stable CAD should consider recent controversial findings.
- Further research is needed to refine indications for revascularization in stable CAD.
Abstract:
Treatment of stable coronary artery disease (CAD) relies on improved prognosis and relief of symptoms. National and international guidelines on CAD support the indication of revascularization in patients with limiting symptoms and refractory to optimal medical treatment, as well as in clinical situations where there is a prognostic benefit of interventional treatment. Most of the studies that support the guidelines for indication of revascularization date back to the 1980s and1990s of the last century. Recent studies have revisited the theme and brought a new breath. The present review provides a critical analysis of classic indications for revascularization, reviewing evidence from the studies of the 1970s to the recent controversial ORBITA study.
Related Concept Videos
Indicators
Classical Conditioning
Ivan Pavlov observed that dogs...
Principles of Classical Conditioning
During the...
Critical Region, Critical Values and Significance Level
In hypothesis testing, a sample statistic is converted to a test statistic using z, t, or chi-square distribution. A critical region is an area under the curve in probability distributions demarcated by the critical value. When the test statistic falls in this region, it suggests that the null hypothesis must be rejected. As this region contains all those values of the...
Critical Values
Classical Conditioning in Daily Life
John B. Watson and Rosalie Rayner famously demonstrated the development of fear through classical conditioning in their experiment with Little Albert. They paired the...

