Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

10.0K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
10.0K
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

13.7K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
13.7K
Random Error01:04

Random Error

9.2K
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
9.2K
Margin of Error01:27

Margin of Error

7.1K
The margin of error is also called the maximum error of an estimate. The margin of error is the maximum possible or expected difference between the observed sample parameter value and the actual population parameter value. For proportion, it is the maximum difference between the value of sample proportion obtained from the data and the true value of population proportion. As the true value of the population parameter is not known, the margin of error is calculated using the sample statistic.
7.1K
Contaminants and Errors01:16

Contaminants and Errors

354
Effective sample preparation is crucial for accurate and reliable laboratory analysis. During this process, two significant sources of error can arise: concentration bias from improper sample splitting and contamination caused by methods used to reduce particle size, such as grinding or homogenization. Identifying and minimizing these potential errors is crucial to ensuring the validity of the analysis.
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
354
Standard Error of the Mean01:13

Standard Error of the Mean

11.8K
The sampling variability of a statistic is defined as how much the statistic varies from one sample to another. The sampling variability of a statistic is typically measured by measuring its standard error.
The standard error of the mean is an example of a standard error. It is a unique standard deviation known as the standard deviation of the sampling distribution of the mean. The standard error of the mean is a statistic that calculates how correctly a sample distribution represents a...
11.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Contrasting cognitive control in the Simon and spatial Stroop tasks regarding their interference with the control of standing balance.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

An amino acid insertion in the PHI loop of the VP2 capsid protein of serotype 1 infectious bursal disease virus deeply modifies its antigenicity and abrogates its propagation into B cells.

Veterinary research·2026
Same author

The earlier you know, the smoother you act: anticipatory control in solo and dyadic juggling.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same author

The HIT Network for Children and Adolescents With CNS Tumors Facilitates Improvements of Diagnostic Assessments, Multimodal Treatments, Individual Counseling, and Research in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland.

Pediatric blood & cancer·2026
Same author

A Multilayer Model of Automatization: Core processes driving the emergence of automatic action control.

Acta psychologica·2025
Same author

Comparing Metacognitive Representations of Bodily and External Agency.

eNeuro·2025
Same journal

Analysis of human visual experience data.

Journal of vision·2026
Same journal

Pyramid-based Bayesian modeling for high-resolution behavioral analysis.

Journal of vision·2026
Same journal

Sensation without perception: The white whale effect and perceptual blindness in autonomous vehicles.

Journal of vision·2026
Same journal

Gaze behavior during closed-captioned movie viewing adapts to absent audio through more frequent switching between text and scene.

Journal of vision·2026
Same journal

In pursuit of saccade awareness: Limited volitional control and minimal conscious access to catch-up saccades during smooth pursuit eye movements.

Journal of vision·2026
Same journal

Dissociable effects of element-lifetime and stimulus-duration on local and global motion processing: An equivalent noise study.

Journal of vision·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 26, 2026

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

9.1K

Predictive error processing distinguishes between relevant and irrelevant errors after visuomotor learning.

Lisa Katharina Maurer1,2, Michael Joch1,2, Mathias Hegele1,2

  • 1Department of Psychology and Sport Science, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.

Journal of Vision
|April 18, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Humans can differentiate relevant errors from irrelevant ones using brain signals. The error-related negativity (Ne/ERN) brain response helps attribute errors to oneself, improving motor learning and behavior adaptation.

More Related Videos

A Prediction Error-driven Retrieval Procedure for Destabilizing and Rewriting Maladaptive Reward Memories in Hazardous Drinkers
08:05

A Prediction Error-driven Retrieval Procedure for Destabilizing and Rewriting Maladaptive Reward Memories in Hazardous Drinkers

Published on: January 5, 2018

10.2K
Genome-wide Surveillance of Transcription Errors in Eukaryotic Organisms
09:30

Genome-wide Surveillance of Transcription Errors in Eukaryotic Organisms

Published on: September 13, 2018

9.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 26, 2026

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

9.1K
A Prediction Error-driven Retrieval Procedure for Destabilizing and Rewriting Maladaptive Reward Memories in Hazardous Drinkers
08:05

A Prediction Error-driven Retrieval Procedure for Destabilizing and Rewriting Maladaptive Reward Memories in Hazardous Drinkers

Published on: January 5, 2018

10.2K
Genome-wide Surveillance of Transcription Errors in Eukaryotic Organisms
09:30

Genome-wide Surveillance of Transcription Errors in Eukaryotic Organisms

Published on: September 13, 2018

9.9K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Motor Learning

Background:

  • Error processing is crucial for learning and behavioral adaptation.
  • Differentiating relevant (self-caused) from irrelevant (external) errors is key for effective learning.
  • The error-related negativity (Ne/ERN) is a neural signal associated with error detection.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if the Ne/ERN can distinguish between relevant and irrelevant errors in complex visuomotor tasks.
  • To explore the neural mechanisms underlying error attribution in goal-oriented movements.
  • To examine the relationship between neural error signals and subsequent behavioral adjustments.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized event-related potentials (ERPs) to measure neural activity.
  • Compared neural responses to self-induced (relevant) versus externally manipulated (irrelevant) errors in a virtual throwing task.
  • Analyzed the error-related negativity (Ne/ERN) and feedback-related negativity (FRN) components.

Main Results:

  • The Ne/ERN showed a stronger response to self-induced errors.
  • The feedback-related negativity (FRN) correlated more with externally manipulated errors.
  • Behavioral adjustments were significantly larger following relevant errors compared to irrelevant errors.

Conclusions:

  • Predictive neural processes, indicated by the Ne/ERN, play a role in attributing errors in complex visuomotor tasks.
  • The brain differentiates error sources, enabling targeted behavioral adaptations.
  • This finding has implications for understanding motor control and learning in naturalistic settings.