Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

10.0K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
10.0K
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

13.7K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
13.7K
Random Error01:04

Random Error

9.2K
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
9.2K
Margin of Error01:27

Margin of Error

7.1K
The margin of error is also called the maximum error of an estimate. The margin of error is the maximum possible or expected difference between the observed sample parameter value and the actual population parameter value. For proportion, it is the maximum difference between the value of sample proportion obtained from the data and the true value of population proportion. As the true value of the population parameter is not known, the margin of error is calculated using the sample statistic.
7.1K
Contaminants and Errors01:16

Contaminants and Errors

354
Effective sample preparation is crucial for accurate and reliable laboratory analysis. During this process, two significant sources of error can arise: concentration bias from improper sample splitting and contamination caused by methods used to reduce particle size, such as grinding or homogenization. Identifying and minimizing these potential errors is crucial to ensuring the validity of the analysis.
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
354
Standard Error of the Mean01:13

Standard Error of the Mean

11.8K
The sampling variability of a statistic is defined as how much the statistic varies from one sample to another. The sampling variability of a statistic is typically measured by measuring its standard error.
The standard error of the mean is an example of a standard error. It is a unique standard deviation known as the standard deviation of the sampling distribution of the mean. The standard error of the mean is a statistic that calculates how correctly a sample distribution represents a...
11.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same journal

Preliminary tide gauge evidence for equilibrium and non-equilibrium pole tide variability after the 2015 Chandler Wobble amplitude reduction.

Earth, planets, and space : EPS·2026
Same journal

Forecasting secular variation using physics-informed neural networks for IGRF-14.

Earth, planets, and space : EPS·2026
Same journal

Global data-driven predictions of seasonal non-tectonic signals in vertical GNSS displacement time series from non-tidal surface loading data.

Earth, planets, and space : EPS·2026
Same journal

How do core surface flow models vary when inverted from IGRF-14 candidate field models?

Earth, planets, and space : EPS·2026
Same journal

IGRF-14 secular variation prediction from core surface flow acceleration.

Earth, planets, and space : EPS·2026
Same journal

Model calculations for neutron-induced reactions in meteorites and planetary surfaces.

Earth, planets, and space : EPS·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 26, 2026

Evaluation of an Exclusive Spur Dike U-Turn Design with Radar-Collected Data and Simulation
11:41

Evaluation of an Exclusive Spur Dike U-Turn Design with Radar-Collected Data and Simulation

Published on: February 1, 2020

20.9K

Spatial distribution of errors associated with multistatic meteor radar.

W K Hocking1

  • 1Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Western Ontario, 1151 Richmond St. North, London, ON N6A 3K7 Canada.

Earth, Planets, and Space : EPS
|April 19, 2019
PubMed
Summary

New software helps analyze errors in multistatic meteor radar (MMR) systems. This advancement improves the spatial overview of atmospheric conditions in the mesopause region by addressing measurement uncertainties.

Keywords:
ErrorsMeteorMultistaticRadarReflectionScatterSpecular

More Related Videos

Evaluation of the Spatial Distribution of γH2AX following Ionizing Radiation
09:28

Evaluation of the Spatial Distribution of γH2AX following Ionizing Radiation

Published on: August 7, 2010

13.2K
Tracking Infiltration Front Depth Using Time-lapse Multi-offset Gathers Collected with Array Antenna Ground Penetrating Radar
07:14

Tracking Infiltration Front Depth Using Time-lapse Multi-offset Gathers Collected with Array Antenna Ground Penetrating Radar

Published on: May 1, 2018

8.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 26, 2026

Evaluation of an Exclusive Spur Dike U-Turn Design with Radar-Collected Data and Simulation
11:41

Evaluation of an Exclusive Spur Dike U-Turn Design with Radar-Collected Data and Simulation

Published on: February 1, 2020

20.9K
Evaluation of the Spatial Distribution of γH2AX following Ionizing Radiation
09:28

Evaluation of the Spatial Distribution of γH2AX following Ionizing Radiation

Published on: August 7, 2010

13.2K
Tracking Infiltration Front Depth Using Time-lapse Multi-offset Gathers Collected with Array Antenna Ground Penetrating Radar
07:14

Tracking Infiltration Front Depth Using Time-lapse Multi-offset Gathers Collected with Array Antenna Ground Penetrating Radar

Published on: May 1, 2018

8.2K

Area of Science:

  • Atmospheric Science
  • Geophysics
  • Radar Technology

Background:

  • The proliferation of low-power meteor radars enables novel applications like multistatic meteor radar (MMR) systems.
  • Simultaneous operation of multiple, closely spaced radar sites allows for forward scatter observations between stations.
  • This technique offers potential for enhanced spatial mapping of mesopause region atmospheric conditions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop software for quantifying measurement uncertainties in multistatic meteor radar (MMR) systems.
  • To identify and discuss typical errors that can limit the application of MMR techniques.
  • To provide a tool for optimizing the configuration and deployment of MMR systems.

Main Methods:

  • Development of specialized software to calculate and assess error sources in MMR data.
  • Analysis of measurement uncertainties, particularly in zones between radar sites.
  • Case studies and examples illustrating common error patterns.

Main Results:

  • The developed software can determine the severity of measurement errors in MMR systems.
  • Certain locations, especially midpoints between radar sites, are prone to significant errors.
  • Understanding these errors is crucial for accurate atmospheric condition diagnosis.

Conclusions:

  • The developed software is a valuable tool for researchers using or planning to use MMR systems.
  • Addressing identified errors can enhance the reliability and spatial coverage of mesopause region observations.
  • This work contributes to the optimization of multistatic meteor radar network design and data interpretation.