The frequency of referent objects influences expectations about label length.
1Cognitive Science Department, Central European University, Október 6. u. 7, H-1051 Budapest, Hungary.
Acta Psychologica
|April 20, 2019
Summary
Researchers found that word length is influenced by situational context. When guessing names for rare objects, people preferred longer words, suggesting context impacts word form inference.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Psycholinguistics
- Language Acquisition
Background:
- Linguistic context influences word length for precision and conciseness.
- The impact of referential-situational context on word length remains less explored.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate if situational context affects the expected word length.
- To determine if object frequency influences label length selection.
Main Methods:
- Participants viewed novel objects presented frequently or rarely.
- In a test phase, participants selected labels (short or long) for objects.
- Object frequency (rare vs. frequent) was manipulated as a situational context variable.
Main Results:
- Participants selected longer labels more often for rare objects compared to frequent objects.
- This preference for longer labels with rare objects was statistically significant.
- Results held even with varied label pairs, indicating situational context's role.
Conclusions:
- Situational context, specifically object frequency, influences word form inference.
- Language users appear to adjust expected word length based on contextual cues.
- This suggests a dynamic interplay between context and word form selection.
Related Concept Videos
01:08Determination of Expected Frequency
2.6K
Suppose one wants to test independence between the two variables of a contingency table. The values in the table constitute the observed frequencies of the dataset. But how does one determine the expected frequency of the dataset? One of the important assumptions is that the two variables are independent, which means the variables do not influence each other. For independent variables, the statistical probability of any event involving both variables is calculated by multiplying the individual...
2.6K
01:19Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests
7.2K
A goodness-of-fit test is conducted to determine whether the observed frequency values are statistically similar to the frequencies expected for the dataset. Suppose the expected frequencies for a dataset are equal such as when predicting the frequency of any number appearing when casting a die. In that case, the expected frequency is the ratio of the total number of observations (n) to the number of categories (k).
7.2K
01:15Expected Value
7.4K
The expected value is known as the "long-term" average or mean. This means that over the long term of experimenting over and over, you would expect this average. The expected average is represented by the symbol μ. It is calculated as follows:
7.4K
01:21Frequency-dependent Selection
23.3K
When the fitness of a trait is influenced by how common it is (i.e., its frequency) relative to different traits within a population, this is referred to as frequency-dependent selection. Frequency-dependent selection may occur between species or within a single species. This type of selection can either be positive—with more common phenotypes having higher fitness—or negative, with rarer phenotypes conferring increased fitness.
23.3K
01:03Inertial Frames of Reference
8.7K
Newton’s first law is usually considered to be a statement about reference frames. It provides a method for identifying a special type of reference frame: the inertial reference frame. In principle, we can make the net force on a body zero. If its velocity relative to a given frame is constant, then that frame is said to be inertial. So, by definition, an inertial reference frame is a reference frame where Newton's first law holds valid. Newton's first law applies to objects with...
8.7K
01:27Non-inertial Frames of Reference
7.1K
A reference frame accelerating or decelerating relative to an inertial frame is a non-inertial frame. To help understand this, consider what taking off in an airplane, turning a corner in a car, riding a merry-go-round, and the circular motion of a tropical cyclone all have in common. All these systems are accelerating, decelerating, or rotating relative to the Earth; hence, they all are non-inertial frames. All these systems exhibit inertial forces, which merely seem to arise from motion,...
7.1K