Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 26, 2026

Determination of the Absorption, Translocation, and Distribution of Imidacloprid in Wheat

Determination of the Absorption, Translocation, and Distribution of Imidacloprid in Wheat

Published on: April 28, 2023

Zinc Absorption From Agronomically Biofortified Wheat Is Similar to Post-Harvest Fortified Wheat and Is a Substantial

Coralie Signorell¹, Michael B Zimmermann¹, Ismail Cakmak²

¹Laboratory of Human Nutrition, Institute of Food, Nutrition and Health, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

The Journal of Nutrition

|April 21, 2019

Abstract

Background:

Limited data exist on human zinc absorption from wheat biofortified via foliar (FBW) or root (hydroponically fortified wheat, HBW) zinc application. Stable isotope labels added at point of consumption (extrinsic labeling) might not reflect absorption from native zinc obtained by intrinsic labeling.

Objectives:

We measured fractional and total zinc absorption (FAZ, TAZ) in FBW and HBW wheat, compared with control wheat (CW) and fortified wheat (FW). The effect of labeling method was assessed in HBW (study 1), and the effect of milling extraction rate (EXR, 80% and 100%) in FBW (studies 2 and 3).

Methods:

Generally healthy adults (n = 71, age: 18-45 y, body mass index: 18.5-25 kg/m2) were allocated to 1 of the studies, in which they served as their own controls. In study 1, men and women consumed wheat porridges colabeled intrinsically and extrinsically with 67Zn and 70Zn. In studies 2 and 3, women consumed wheat flatbreads (chapatis) labeled extrinsically. Zinc absorption was measured with the oral to intravenous tracer ratio method with a 4-wk wash-out period between meals. Data were analyzed with linear mixed models.

Results:

In study 1 there were no differences in zinc absorption from extrinsic versus intrinsic labels in either FW or HBW. Similarly, FAZ and TAZ from FW and HBW did not differ. TAZ was 70-76% higher in FW and HBW compared with CW (P < 0.01). In studies 2 and 3, TAZ from FW and FBW did not differ but was 20-48% higher compared with CW (P < 0.001). Extraction rate had no effect on TAZ.

Conclusions:

Colabeling demonstrates that extrinsic zinc isotopic labels can be used to accurately quantify zinc absorption from wheat in humans. Biofortification through foliar zinc application, root zinc application, or fortification provides higher TAZ compared with unfortified wheat. In biofortified wheat, extraction rate (100-80%) has a limited impact on total zinc absorption. These studies were registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01775319).

Keywords:

biofortification extrinsic tag foliar zinc fortification intrinsic tag stable isotope technique wheat zinc zinc deficiency

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Exploring Cellular Zinc Regulation Through ZnT1 Functionality

Author Spotlight: Exploring Cellular Zinc Regulation Through ZnT1 Functionality

Published on: June 2, 2023

Film Extrusion of Crambe abyssinica/Wheat Gluten Blends

Film Extrusion of Crambe abyssinica/Wheat Gluten Blends

Published on: January 17, 2017

Related Concept Videos

Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy: Radiation and Light Sources

Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy: Radiation and Light Sources

Atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) relies on the Beer-Lambert law, which requires that the radiation source emits a narrow range of wavelengths to match the absorption characteristics of the analyte atom. The primary criteria for choosing an appropriate radiation source in AAS is to provide a precise and intense emission at specific wavelengths that will allow accurate detection of the analyte.
Two common narrow-range 'line' sources used in AAS are hollow-cathode lamps (HCLs) and...

Bioavailability Study Design: Absolute Versus Relative Bioavailability

Bioavailability Study Design: Absolute Versus Relative Bioavailability

Bioavailability is a crucial pharmacokinetic parameter that quantifies the proportion of an administered drug that reaches the systemic circulation and is available for therapeutic action. Regulatory agencies mandate the assessment of bioavailability, typically measured as the area under the drug plasma concentration-versus-time curve (AUC), to ensure the efficacy and safety of pharmaceutical products. These evaluations are categorized as absolute and relative bioavailability studies.Absolute...

Bioavailability: Overview

Bioavailability: Overview

Bioavailability refers to the proportion of an administered drug that reaches the systemic circulation in its active, unaltered form. It is a crucial pharmacokinetic parameter that determines the effectiveness of a drug in achieving its intended therapeutic outcomes. The route of administration significantly influences bioavailability, with intravenous administration achieving 100% bioavailability as the drug directly enters the bloodstream. In contrast, oral administration often results in...

Bioavailability: Overview

Bioavailability: Overview

Bioavailability refers to the proportion of an unaltered drug that, after administration, enters the systemic circulation and can be distributed to the desired action site. Factors such as gastrointestinal (GI) absorption and liver biotransformation influence the bioavailability of a drug when it is administered orally. When a drug is administered intravenously, it enters the systemic circulation directly; by definition, its bioavailability is assumed to be 100%. The bioavailability of an...

Bioavailability Enhancement: Determination and Conceptual Approaches in Overcoming Bioavailability Problems

Bioavailability Enhancement: Determination and Conceptual Approaches in Overcoming Bioavailability Problems

Body:Bioavailability is a critical pharmacological concept that measures the extent and rate at which an active drug ingredient or therapeutic moiety enters the systemic circulation, remaining unchanged. It's a pivotal factor in determining a drug's efficacy and safety.The Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) plays an essential role in drug development by categorizing drugs into four classes based on their solubility and permeability. This classification aids in understanding drug...

Drug Absorption: Factors Affecting GI Absorption

Drug Absorption: Factors Affecting GI Absorption

The process of oral drug absorption can be influenced by several factors. Weakly acidic drugs tend to be absorbed more readily from the stomach due to their nonionized state. However, absorption may be less efficient in the upper intestine, where drugs are often ionized. Interestingly, despite the stomach's apparent advantage for drug absorption, its mucous layer can hinder diffusion. Its surface area is also smaller than the intestine's, which can further slow down the absorption rate.

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Iron deficiency during pregnancy and lactation.

Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care·2026

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Iron, Vitamin A, and Zinc Biofortification in Selected Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Modeling Study.

The Journal of nutrition·2026

Nutritional and toxicological trade-offs in selenium enrichment: a bioaccessibility-based comparison of biofortified and naturally enriched foods.

Food chemistry·2026

The EULAR Research Center-5 years young and going strong.

EULAR rheumatology open·2026

Adherence to the eat-lancet planetary health diet and sustainability impacts of the Swiss diet.

European journal of nutrition·2026

Food-gut continuum of biofortified micronutrients: Influence of breadmaking processes on iodine, selenium, and zinc bioaccessibility and epithelial responses in an in vitro intestinal model.

Food chemistry: X·2026

See all related articles