Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 26, 2026

The Use of Mixed Reality in Custom-Made Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A First Case Report
Published on: August 4, 2022
Multicenter Evaluation of a Modular Dual Mobility Construct for Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty
Ronald C Huang1, Art L Malkani2, Steven F Harwin3
1Hospital for Special Surgery, Adult Reconstruction and Joint Replacement, New York, NY; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, BronxCare Health Systems, Bronx, NY.
Introduction:
Modular Dual Mobility (MDM) constructs in total hip arthroplasty (THA) offer increased hip stability compared with constrained liners, without compromising hip range of motion. The purpose of this study was to evaluate outcomes of revision THA using MDM.
Methods:
The study was a multiinstitutional retrospective cohort study of 315 hips that underwent revision THA using MDM between 2011 and 2017. Clinical outcomes and reasons for failure were collected.
Results:
Three hundred fifteen patients met 1-year minimum follow-up (mean 3.3 years). Nine hips had instability postoperatively (2.9%), and 30 hips required reoperation (9.5%). Seven had recurrent instability (6.5%) which was associated with liner-only exchange (P = .021) and liner outer diameter of ≤ 38 mm (P = .016).
Conclusion:
Revision THA with MDM provided a low rate of instability and reoperation in a revision cohort. Recurrent instability following use of MDM in revision THA was associated with retention of the acetabular component and polyethylene outer diameter ≤ 38 mm.
Level Of Evidence:
Therapeutic Level III.
Related Concept Videos
Total Voids in Concrete
Bode Plots Construction
Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence Microscopy
Construction of Root Locus
For positive gain values, the root locus exists on the real axis to the left of an odd number of finite open-loop poles or zeros. The root locus starts at the open-loop poles and traces the paths of the closed-loop poles as the gain...
Construction of Frequency Distribution
First, make a table with two columns—one with the title of the data that needs to be organized, and the other column for frequency. [Draw a third column for tally marks if needed]. Then, take a look at the items given in the data set and decide if an ungrouped frequency distribution table or a grouped frequency distribution table would be more suitable. If there are large sets of different values, then it is...
Static, Stagnation, Dynamic and Total Pressure

