Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 26, 2026

Noninvasive Determination of Vortex Formation Time Using Transesophageal Echocardiography During Cardiac Surgery
Published on: November 28, 2018
The Bayley-III scale may underestimate neurodevelopmental disability after cardiac surgery in infants
Andrew B Goldstone1, Michael Baiocchi2, David Wypij3
1Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Insights
The Bayley-III scale shows higher neurodevelopmental scores in infants after heart surgery compared to the BSID-II. This difference means scores cannot be directly compared across different versions for tracking progress.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Cardiology
- Neurodevelopmental Pediatrics
- Medical Statistics
Background:
- Congenital heart disease (CHD) survivors face a high risk of neurodevelopmental disability.
- Standardized assessments like the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development are crucial for evaluating neurodevelopmental outcomes.
- The Bayley-III, the latest edition, is reported to provide higher scores than its predecessor, the BSID-II.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare neurodevelopmental assessment scores between the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development 3rd Edition (Bayley-III) and the Bayley Scales of Infant Development 2nd Edition (BSID-II) in infants following cardiac surgery.
- To determine if the Bayley-III classifies fewer children as impaired compared to the BSID-II in this population.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 2198 infants undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass between 1996 and 2009 was evaluated.
- Propensity score matching was employed in a subset of 705 patients to mitigate confounding by indication.
- Neurodevelopmental outcomes were assessed using both BSID-II and Bayley-III.
Main Results:
- Unadjusted Bayley-III motor, cognitive, and language scores were significantly higher than BSID-II scores.
- In propensity-matched analyses, Bayley-III motor scores were substantially higher (absolute difference 14.1), and fewer children were classified with severe or mild-to-moderate impairment.
- While Bayley-III cognitive and language scores were also higher, the proportion of children with severe cognitive/language impairment did not differ between the two scales.
Conclusions:
- The Bayley-III scale demonstrates a systematic bias towards higher scores compared to the BSID-II in infants post-cardiac surgery.
- This score inflation with the Bayley-III prevents direct, valid comparisons of neurodevelopmental outcomes between historical (BSID-II) and contemporary (Bayley-III) cohorts.
- Clinical interpretation and longitudinal tracking require careful consideration of the specific Bayley scale edition used.
Objectives:
Neurodevelopmental disability is the most common complication among congenital heart surgery survivors. The Bayley scales are standardized instruments to assess neurodevelopment. The most recent edition (Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development 3rd Edition, Bayley-III) yields better-than-expected scores in typically developing and high-risk infants than the second edition (Bayley Scales of Infant Development 2nd Edition, BSID-II). We compared BSID-II and Bayley-III scores in infants undergoing cardiac surgery.
Methods:
We evaluated 2198 infants who underwent operations with cardiopulmonary bypass between 1996 and 2009 at 26 institutions. We used propensity score matching to limit confounding by indication in a subset of patients (n = 705).
Results:
Overall, unadjusted Bayley-III motor scores were higher than BSID-II Psychomotor Development Index scores (90.7 ± 17.2 vs 77.6 ± 18.8, P < 0.001), and unadjusted Bayley-III composite cognitive and language scores were higher than BSID-II Mental Development Index scores (92.0 ± 15.4 vs 88.2 ± 16.7, P < 0.001). In the propensity-matched analysis, Bayley-III motor scores were higher than BSID-II Psychomotor Development Index scores [absolute difference 14.1, 95% confidence interval (CI) 11.7-17.6; P < 0.001] and the Bayley-III classified fewer children as having severe [odds ratio (OR) 0.24; 95% CI 0.14-0.42] or mild-to-moderate impairment (OR 0.21; 95% CI 0.14-0.32). The composite of Bayley-III cognitive and language scores was higher than BSID-II Mental Development Index scores (absolute difference 4.0, 95% CI 1.4-6.7; P = 0.003), but there was no difference between Bayley editions in the proportion of children classified as having severe cognitive and language impairment.
Conclusions:
The Bayley-III yielded higher scores than the BSID-II and classified fewer children as severely impaired. The systematic bias towards higher scores with the Bayley-III precludes valid comparisons between early and contemporary cardiac surgery cohorts.
Related Concept Videos
Intellectual Disability
Learning Disabilities
Dyslexia
Dyslexia is a...
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization
pH Scale
Scaling
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children

