Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 26, 2026
10:45
Brain Imaging Investigation of the Neural Correlates of Observing Virtual Social Interactions
Published on: July 6, 2011
12.1K
Third-party punishment following observed social rejection
Stephanie J Dimitroff1, Ethan G Harrod1, Karen E Smith1
1Department of Psychology.
Emotion (Washington, D.C.)
|April 23, 2019
Summary
Adults will punish individuals who unfairly reject strangers, especially when feeling angry. A history of bullying increases this third-party punishment behavior, showing empathy for victims.
Area of Science:
- Social Psychology
- Behavioral Economics
- Moral Psychology
Background:
- Third-party punishment is well-studied in group cooperation and economic contexts.
- Limited research exists on punishment for personal social transgressions.
- Understanding punishment for social rejection is crucial for social norm enforcement.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate whether adults punish individuals for undeservedly rejecting a stranger.
- To identify predictors of third-party punishment in response to social rejection.
- To explore the role of personal history, such as bullying, in third-party punishment.
Main Methods:
- Experimental design involving participants observing a social rejection scenario.
- Measurement of participants' emotional responses (anger, sympathy).
- Assessment of participants' personal history of bullying.
- Quantification of third-party punishment behavior.
Main Results:
- Participants engaged in third-party punishment after witnessing social rejection.
- Feeling upset with the rejecter predicted punishment, while sympathy for the victim did not.
- Individuals with a history of bullying were more likely to punish the rejecter.
Conclusions:
- Empathic anger is a key motivator for punishing social norm transgressors.
- A history of bullying may heighten sensitivity to social rejection and promote retributive action.
- Findings extend the understanding of third-party punishment beyond economic contexts to social interactions.
Related Concept Videos
01:27Punishment
911
Negative reinforcement and punishment are often confused but serve distinct functions in behavior modification. Reinforcement, whether positive or negative, increases the likelihood of a desired behavior, while punishment decreases it.
Punishment can be positive or negative. Positive punishment involves adding an undesirable stimulus, such as scolding, to decrease a behavior. Negative punishment involves removing a desirable stimulus, such as taking away a favorite toy, to decrease behavior....
Punishment can be positive or negative. Positive punishment involves adding an undesirable stimulus, such as scolding, to decrease a behavior. Negative punishment involves removing a desirable stimulus, such as taking away a favorite toy, to decrease behavior....
911
00:52Social Proof
31.5K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
31.5K
02:10Social Scripts
10.3K
People tend to know what behavior is expected of them in specific, familiar settings. A script is a person’s knowledge about the sequence of events expected in a specific setting (Schank & Abelson, 1977). Essentially, scripts are a particular kind of schema, one containing default values for the features within an event. In the restaurant example, the script's features include the props (e.g., tables, menu, food, and money), the roles to be played (e.g., customer and waiter),...
10.3K
01:41Social Traps
26.3K
Social traps are negative situations where people get caught in a direction or relationship that later proves to be unpleasant, with no easy way to back out of or avoid. The concept was orignally introduced by John Platt who applied psychology to Garrett Hardin's "Tragedy of the Commons", where in New England herd owners could let their cattle graze in the common ground. This situation seems like a good idea, but an individual could have an advantage. If they owned...
26.3K
01:04Social Facilitation
36.1K
Not all intergroup interactions lead to negative outcomes. Sometimes, being in a group situation can improve performance. Social facilitation occurs when an individual performs better when an audience is watching than when the individual performs the behavior alone. This typically occurs when people are performing a task for which they are skilled.
36.1K
02:06Social Exchange Theory
39.5K
We have discussed why we form relationships, what attracts us to others, and different types of love. But what determines whether we are satisfied with and stay in a relationship? One theory that provides an explanation is social exchange theory. According to social exchange theory, we act as naïve economists in keeping a tally of the ratio of costs and benefits of forming and maintaining a relationship with others (Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003).
39.5K