Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

What is a Sensory System?01:31

What is a Sensory System?

100.9K
Sensory systems detect stimuli—such as light and sound waves—and transduce them into neural signals that can be interpreted by the nervous system. In addition to external stimuli detected by the senses, some sensory systems detect internal stimuli—such as the proprioceptors in muscles and tendons that send feedback about limb position.
100.9K
Impact of Individuals on Individuals01:30

Impact of Individuals on Individuals

372
Human behavior is intricately shaped by social influences that arise from interactions with others in diverse contexts. These influences not only mold beliefs and attitudes but also drive the regulation of behaviors through both direct communication and observational learning. The study of these processes falls within the domain of social psychology, which seeks to understand how individuals are affected by and affect those around them.Mechanisms of Social InfluenceDirect social influence...
372
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

8.1K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
8.1K
Electric Potential and Potential Difference01:16

Electric Potential and Potential Difference

5.6K
Suppose a positive test charge moves away from a positive static charge, then the Coulomb force does positive work, and its electric potential energy decreases. The potential energy per unit charge is defined as the electric potential. The electric potential is independent of the test charge.
When a test charge moves from the initial to the final position, the electric potential difference between those positions is defined as the ratio of the change in the potential energy to the charge on the...
5.6K
Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test01:14

Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test

3.3K
The F-test is used to compare two sample variances to each other or compare the sample variance to the population variance. It is used to decide whether an indeterminate error can explain the difference in their values. The underlying assumptions that allow the use of the F-test include the data set or sets are normally distributed, and the data sets are independent of each other. The test statistic F is calculated by dividing one variance by another. In other words, the square of one standard...
3.3K
Sum and Difference OpAmps01:22

Sum and Difference OpAmps

1.4K
Operational amplifiers (op-amps) are versatile devices that extend beyond amplification. In this context, two specific op-amp configurations are explored: the summing and difference amplifiers.
A summing amplifier, or an adder, utilizes an op-amp to merge multiple input signals into a single output signal. When audio signals are introduced into its input channels, the input resistors initiate currents that traverse feedback resistors, resulting in an output voltage. Applying Kirchhoff's current...
1.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Spiking the mind: Rethinking the role of cortical feedback in visual mental imagery.

Psychological review·2026
Same author

The Nexus of Hoarding and Mental Imagery Extremes: Exploring Hoarding Tendencies in Aphantasia and Hyperphantasia.

Psychological reports·2026
Same author

Do you see what I see? Linking involuntary nonretinal (phantom) vision and mental imagery in aphantasia.

Journal of vision·2025
Same author

Representational dynamics of the main dimensions of object space: Face/body selectivity aligns temporally with animal taxonomy but not with animacy.

Journal of vision·2025
Same author

The potential risks of opening the mind's eye with psychedelic therapies.

Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior·2025
Same author

The representational dynamics of the animal appearance bias in human visual cortex are indicative of fast feedforward processing.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 26, 2026

Assessment of Sensory Thresholds in Dogs Using Mechanical and Hot Thermal Quantitative Sensory Testing
07:12

Assessment of Sensory Thresholds in Dogs Using Mechanical and Hot Thermal Quantitative Sensory Testing

Published on: October 26, 2021

2.7K

Measuring Thought-Control Failure: Sensory Mechanisms and Individual Differences.

Eugene L Kwok1, Gaelle Leys1,2, Roger Koenig-Robert1

  • 1School of Psychology, University of New South Wales.

Psychological Science
|April 23, 2019
PubMed
Summary

Researchers developed a new objective method to study thought control using visual illusions. Thought control failures stem from involuntary mental imagery, especially in anxious individuals, while mindfulness aids control.

Keywords:
binocular rivalrymental imagerymindfulnessopen datathought substitutionthought suppression

More Related Videos

Imaging of the Microstructural Failure Mechanism in the Human Hip
08:43

Imaging of the Microstructural Failure Mechanism in the Human Hip

Published on: September 29, 2023

1.4K
Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills
06:52

Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills

Published on: September 17, 2019

6.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 26, 2026

Assessment of Sensory Thresholds in Dogs Using Mechanical and Hot Thermal Quantitative Sensory Testing
07:12

Assessment of Sensory Thresholds in Dogs Using Mechanical and Hot Thermal Quantitative Sensory Testing

Published on: October 26, 2021

2.7K
Imaging of the Microstructural Failure Mechanism in the Human Hip
08:43

Imaging of the Microstructural Failure Mechanism in the Human Hip

Published on: September 29, 2023

1.4K
Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills
06:52

Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills

Published on: September 17, 2019

6.8K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Perception

Background:

  • Thought control is vital for cognitive functions and mental health.
  • Objective measurement of thought control has been challenging due to subjectivity.
  • Previous research lacked mechanistic understanding of thought control failures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a novel objective method for assessing thought control success and failure.
  • To investigate the mechanisms underlying thought control failures.
  • To explore the role of individual differences in thought control ability.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized binocular rivalry, a perceptual illusion, to measure the sensory strength of visual thoughts.
  • Designed five experiments involving 67 participants.
  • Compared thought suppression and thought substitution strategies.

Main Results:

  • Thought control failure is linked to involuntary, nonreportable sensory representations during suppression.
  • Thought substitution did not elicit these involuntary representations.
  • High anxiety and schizotypy correlated with poorer thought control; mindfulness correlated with better control.

Conclusions:

  • The study provides objective insights into the mechanisms of thought control.
  • Involuntary sensory representations contribute to thought control failure.
  • Individual differences, such as anxiety, schizotypy, and mindfulness, significantly impact thought control efficacy.