Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 26, 2026

Murine Flexor Tendon Injury and Repair Surgery
Published on: September 19, 2016
Vascular repair after firearm injury is associated with increased morbidity and mortality
Jeffrey J Siracuse1, Thomas W Cheng1, Alik Farber1
1Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass.
Insights
Firearm injuries requiring vascular repair increase mortality risk. These injuries, often to the abdomen, pelvis, or extremities, are linked to higher complication rates and poorer outcomes for patients.
Area of Science:
- Trauma Surgery
- Vascular Surgery
- Public Health
Background:
- Firearm injuries present a significant public health challenge with high morbidity and mortality rates.
- The specific outcomes and characteristics of firearm injuries necessitating concurrent vascular repair remain incompletely understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To characterize the injury details of firearm-related vascular repairs.
- To assess the associated mortality and morbidity following vascular repair in firearm injury patients.
Main Methods:
- Utilized the National Inpatient Sample database (1993-2014) to identify firearm injuries.
- Employed International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes for injury and procedure identification.
- Conducted multivariable analysis to determine the impact of vascular repair on patient outcomes.
Main Results:
- Out of 648,662 firearm injuries, 9.9% required vascular repair.
- Patients undergoing vascular repair had higher mortality (5.51% vs. 1.98%) and complication rates (5.7% vs. 2%).
- Vascular repair was independently associated with increased mortality (OR, 2.68) and complications (OR, 2.12).
Conclusions:
- Firearm injuries involving vascular repair are associated with significantly higher injury severity and mortality.
- Vascular repairs were most common for abdominal/pelvic and extremity injuries, often from assault.
- Head and neck injuries and suicide-related firearm incidents were less frequent indications for vascular repair.
Objective:
Firearm injuries have high morbidity and mortality. Presentation of injuries requiring concurrent vascular repair and its outcomes are unclear. Our study's objective was to characterize the injury details and to assess the associated mortality and morbidity after vascular repair.
Methods:
The National Inpatient Sample was queried from 1993 to 2014 for all firearm injuries. International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes were used to identify firearm injuries and those who also underwent a vascular repair. Multivariable analysis was used to assess the effect of a concurrent vascular repair on outcomes.
Results:
There were 648,662 firearm injuries identified; 63,973 (9.9%) involved a vascular repair. Overall, 88.7% of patients were male, and Medicaid was the most common insurance (40.2%). Intents were assault or legal intervention (60%), unintentional (24.2%), and suicide (8.6%). Patients undergoing vascular repair were younger, more often of black race and male sex, and on Medicaid insurance, with a lower household income and assault/legal intent (P < .005). Patients who underwent vascular repair had a higher frequency of abdomen/pelvis and extremity injuries as well as an elevated New Injury Severity Score (P < .005). Patients with vascular repair were more frequently treated at urban, teaching, and large hospitals (P < .005). Overall mortality rate was 2.2%; patients who underwent vascular repair had a higher mortality compared with those without (5.51% vs 1.98%; P < .001). Patients with vascular repair had higher rates of acute renal failure (3.1% vs 0.8%), venous thromboembolic events (0.5% vs 0.3%), pulmonary-related events (0.6% vs 0.28%), cardiac-related events (0.8% vs 0.2%), sepsis (1.4% vs 0.5%), and any complication (5.7% vs 2%; all P < .0001). Vascular repair was independently associated with mortality (odds ratio [OR], 2.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.43-2.95; P < .0001). Age older than 46 years (OR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.71-2.35; P < .0001), male sex (OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.05-1.25; P = .003), self-pay/no insurance (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.47-1.75; P < .0001), suicide intent (OR, 3.73; 95% CI, 3.36-4.13; P < .0001), unintentional intent (OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.03-1.22; P < .0001), head/neck location (OR, 13.9; 95% CI, 12.5-15.6; P < .0001), Northeast region, and New Injury Severity Score >4 were independently associated with in-hospital mortality. Vascular repair was also independently associated with any complication (OR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.98-2.28; P < .0001).
Conclusions:
Firearm injuries with vascular repair were independently associated with higher injury severity score and mortality. A majority of vascular repairs were performed for injury to the abdomen/pelvis and extremity with assault/legal intent, whereas head and neck injury and suicide intent were the least frequent.
Related Concept Videos
Mismatch Repair
Overview of DNA Repair
Chemically...
Base Excision Repair
The first step of...
Nucleotide Excision Repair
Long-patch Base Excision Repair
Seedless Vascular Plants

