[Dysfunction of bioprostheses. Respective value of echocardiography and of Doppler studies]

The respective diagnostic values of M mode and 2D echocardiography and pulsed and continuous wave Doppler were assessed in bioprosthetic valve dysfunction. The results of the ultrasonic investigations were compared with the operative findings and anatomo pathological appearances in 56 cases of dysfunction. Only cases with surgical confirmation were included. Doppler examinations were carried out in 13 cases. Echocardiographic imaging alone cannot resolve all the diagnostic problems posed: specific signs are rare and were only observed in one out of 7 cases of periprosthetic leak, 7 out of 10 cases of valvular stenosis and 20 out of 36 cases (55 per cent) of valve tear. In cases of valve tear, 2D echocardiography was falsely normal in 15 per cent of cases and gave equivocal results in 30 per cent of cases because it was not possible to visualise the three cusps of the bioprostheses. Doppler echocardiography does not have the same limitations and gives an immediate and accurate assessment of valve function. It is particularly useful for the diagnosis of stenosis and valve tear in which the diagnostic specificity and sensitivity attain 100 per cent (exact diagnosis in all 11 cases of valve tear). At present, continuous wave Doppler seems to be the most reliable diagnostic tool for qualitative and quantitative assessment of primary degeneration of valvular prostheses.