Detection of recurrent brain tumors in children: No significant difference in sensitivity between unenhanced and

Yasmina Bouzidi1, Emmanuel Barteau1, Julien Lejeune2

  • 11 Pediatric Radiology Department, Clocheville Hospital, University Hospital Center of Tours, France.

Abstract

Insights

Unenhanced MRI (U-MRI) showed suboptimal sensitivity for detecting pediatric brain tumor recurrence. Advanced MRI sequences may improve detection, potentially reducing the need for gadolinium contrast agents in follow-up imaging.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Radiology
  • Neuroradiology
  • Oncology Imaging

Background:

  • Gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) are used in pediatric brain tumor follow-up.
  • Intracerebral gadolinium deposition has been reported with unknown risks.
  • This study evaluates unenhanced MRI (U-MRI) for detecting tumor recurrence.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the sensitivity and diagnostic performance of U-MRI in identifying recurrence in children with cerebral tumors in remission.
  • To compare the efficacy of U-MRI with contrast-enhanced MRI for tumor recurrence detection.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective evaluation of 58 U-MRIs from children in remission by multiple radiologists.
  • Data collected included clinical, tumoral, and imaging findings.
  • Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and interobserver agreement were calculated; Fisher test and Fleiss kappa were used.

Main Results:

  • U-MRI demonstrated a sensitivity of 81% and a negative predictive value of 82% among senior radiologists.
  • Sensitivity of U-MRI was not significantly different from contrast-enhanced MRI (86%).
  • Good interobserver agreement (κ = 0.68) was observed among senior readers.

Conclusions:

  • U-MRI alone was suboptimal for detecting recurrence in a significant portion of pediatric patients.
  • Advanced sequences like 3D FLAIR and diffusion-weighted imaging may enhance detection capabilities.
  • Further research is needed to determine if gadolinium administration can be safely omitted in pediatric brain tumor follow-up.

Related Concept Videos

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
8.1K
Phase Contrast and Differential Interference Contrast Microscopy01:26

Phase Contrast and Differential Interference Contrast Microscopy

Phase-Contrast Microscopes
In-phase-contrast microscopes, interference between light directly passing through a cell and light refracted by cellular components is used to create high-contrast, high-resolution images without staining. It is the oldest and simplest type of microscope that creates an image by altering the wavelengths of light rays passing through the specimen. Altered wavelength paths are created using an annular stop in the condenser. The annular stop produces a hollow cone of...
12.8K
Electric Potential and Potential Difference01:16

Electric Potential and Potential Difference

Suppose a positive test charge moves away from a positive static charge, then the Coulomb force does positive work, and its electric potential energy decreases. The potential energy per unit charge is defined as the electric potential. The electric potential is independent of the test charge.
When a test charge moves from the initial to the final position, the electric potential difference between those positions is defined as the ratio of the change in the potential energy to the charge on the...
5.6K
Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test01:14

Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test

The F-test is used to compare two sample variances to each other or compare the sample variance to the population variance. It is used to decide whether an indeterminate error can explain the difference in their values. The underlying assumptions that allow the use of the F-test include the data set or sets are normally distributed, and the data sets are independent of each other. The test statistic F is calculated by dividing one variance by another. In other words, the square of one standard...
3.3K
Sum and Difference OpAmps01:22

Sum and Difference OpAmps

Operational amplifiers (op-amps) are versatile devices that extend beyond amplification. In this context, two specific op-amp configurations are explored: the summing and difference amplifiers.
A summing amplifier, or an adder, utilizes an op-amp to merge multiple input signals into a single output signal. When audio signals are introduced into its input channels, the input resistors initiate currents that traverse feedback resistors, resulting in an output voltage. Applying Kirchhoff's current...
1.4K
Difference Equation Solution using z-Transform01:24

Difference Equation Solution using z-Transform

The z-transform is a powerful tool for analyzing practical discrete-time systems, often represented by linear difference equations. Solving a higher-order difference equation requires knowledge of the input signal and the initial conditions up to one term less than the order of the equation.
The z-transform facilitates handling delayed signals by shifting the signal in the z-domain, which corresponds to delaying the signal in the time domain, and advancing signals by similarly shifting in the...
629