Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 25, 2026

In vivo Structural Assessments of Ocular Disease in Rodent Models using Optical Coherence Tomography
Published on: July 24, 2020
Ocular biometry and refractive outcomes using two swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometers with
Miki Kamikawatoko Omoto1, Hidemasa Torii1, Sachiko Masui1
1Department of Ophthalmology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
This study found that while ocular biometry measurements differ between the ARGOS and IOLMaster 700 swept-source devices, both provide clinically acceptable intraocular lens power calculations for cataract surgery patients.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Biomedical Engineering
- Optical Coherence Tomography
Background:
- Accurate ocular biometry is crucial for effective intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation in cataract surgery.
- Different swept-source optical coherence biometers utilize varying refractive index methodologies, potentially impacting measurement consistency.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare ocular biometry measurements and refractive outcomes between the ARGOS and IOLMaster 700 swept-source optical coherence biometers.
- To evaluate the accuracy of IOL power calculations using standard formulas with data from both devices.
Main Methods:
- A comparative study involving 106 eyes of 106 cataract patients.
- Measurement of axial length (AL), central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), and mean anterior corneal radius of curvature (Rm) using ARGOS and IOLMaster 700.
- Analysis of postoperative refractive outcomes using Barrett Universal II, Haigis, Hoffer Q, and SRK/T formulas.
Main Results:
- Significant differences were observed in mean AL, CCT, ACD, and Rm between the ARGOS and IOLMaster 700 (P < 0.001).
- Mean lens thickness (LT) showed no significant difference between the two biometers.
- The percentages of eyes within ±0.50 and ±1.00 diopters of predicted refraction were not significantly different (P > 0.05).
Conclusions:
- Both ARGOS and IOLMaster 700 biometers yield clinically acceptable accuracy for IOL power calculation.
- Despite measurement variations in ocular biometry parameters, refractive outcomes remain comparable between the two swept-source devices.
Related Concept Videos
Influence of Earth's Curvature and Atmospheric Refraction on Leveling
Indicators
Cardiovascular Drugs: Classification based on Therapeutic Indications
Pharmaceutical Equivalents
Equivalent Capacitance
The following strategies are adopted to calculate...
Equivalent Capacitance

