Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

What is Behavior?00:54

What is Behavior?

10.2K
Behaviors are actions that an organism engages in—they can be related to finding food, reproducing, defending against threats, and many other possible actions. Behaviors include activities related to the environment around the animal—such as migration—as well as social interactions within a species or population. Many behaviors involve motor output—that is, muscle movements—while others involve less visible actions, such as learning.
10.2K
Energy to Drive Translocation01:37

Energy to Drive Translocation

2.7K
Mitochondrial protein import is powered by two distinct energy sources: ATP hydrolysis and electrochemical potential across the inner membrane. Newly synthesized precursors are bound by cytosolic chaperones of the Hsp70 family, which guide them to the import receptors on the mitochondrial surface. Utilizing the energy of ATP hydrolysis, Hsp70 chaperones transfer these precursors to the TOM receptors on the mitochondrial outer membrane.
Generally, polypeptides are unfolded by two distinct...
2.7K
M-Cdk Drives Transition Into Mitosis02:15

M-Cdk Drives Transition Into Mitosis

6.4K
Checkpoints throughout the cell cycle serve as safeguards and gatekeepers, allowing the cell cycle to progress in favorable conditions and slow or halt it in problematic ones. This regulation is known as the cell cycle control system.
Cyclin-dependent kinases, or Cdks, work in concert with cyclins to control cell cycle transitions. M-Cdk, a complex of Cdk1 bound to M cyclin, is a well-known example of this coordinated control that drives the transition from the G2 to the M phase.
M cyclin...
6.4K
Drive-Reduction Theory: Push Theory of Motivation01:27

Drive-Reduction Theory: Push Theory of Motivation

1.2K
Clark Hull's drive-reduction theory, introduced in the 1940s and 1950s and often termed the "push theory" of motivation, provides a framework for understanding how biological and learned drives influence behavior. Hull suggested that motivation originates from the need to alleviate physiological tension caused by unmet biological necessities. The theory proposes that when a basic need, such as hunger or sleep, goes unfulfilled, it creates an internal imbalance. This imbalance, or...
1.2K
Archival Research01:40

Archival Research

17.1K
Some researchers gain access to large amounts of data without interacting with a single research participant. Instead, they use existing records to answer various research questions. This type of research approach is known as archival research. Archival research relies on looking at past records or data sets to look for interesting patterns or relationships. For example, a researcher might access the academic records of all individuals who enrolled in college within the past ten years and...
17.1K
Behaviorism01:28

Behaviorism

4.7K
The field of behaviorism was pioneered by figures such as Ivan Pavlov, John B. Watson, and B.F. Skinner fundamentally shifted the focus of psychology to the observable and controllable aspects of human and animal behavior. This shift marked a critical evolution in the discipline, emphasizing scientific rigor and experimental methodology.
The core premise of behaviorism is its focus on observable behavior rather than internal thoughts or feelings. This approach argues that true scientific...
4.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Feasibility and efficacy of left bundle branch area pacing guided by modified chest lead 1.

Journal of electrocardiology·2026
Same author

Development and Validation of Clinical Scoring System to Estimate Mucus Plug Presence in Asthma.

The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice·2026
Same author

Emphysema and airway disease synergistically impair exercise tolerance in smokers: A CT-based study.

Respiratory physiology & neurobiology·2026
Same author

Dissociated Purkinje potential as an active driver of multifocal Purkinje ventricular tachycardia: A case report.

HeartRhythm case reports·2026
Same author

In-Hospital Nighttime Blood Pressure and Heart Failure Hospitalization After Discharge in Chronic Coronary Disease.

American journal of hypertension·2026
Same author

Association of Airway Mucus Plugs and Physical Activity, Exercise Tolerance, Sarcopenia, and Frailty in Patients With COPD and Pre-COPD.

Respirology (Carlton, Vic.)·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 25, 2026

Driving Under the Influence: How Music Listening Affects Driving Behaviors
07:25

Driving Under the Influence: How Music Listening Affects Driving Behaviors

Published on: March 27, 2019

13.0K

Executive function and dangerous driving behaviors in young drivers.

Yusuke Hayashi1, Anne M Foreman2, Jonathan E Friedel2

  • 1Pennsylvania State University, Hazleton, 76 University Drive, Hazleton, PA 18202, USA.

Transportation Research. Part F, Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
|April 27, 2019
PubMed
Summary

College students with lower executive function are more prone to dangerous driving behaviors like texting, speeding, and driving intoxicated. Specific executive function deficits correlate with distinct risky driving actions, suggesting targeted interventions.

Keywords:
College studentsDistracted drivingDriving while intoxicatedExecutive functionSeat belt useSpeeding

More Related Videos

Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research
07:15

Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research

Published on: December 18, 2020

4.9K
Investigating Drivers of Antireward in Addiction Behavior with Anatomically Specific Single-Cell Gene Expression Methods
09:29

Investigating Drivers of Antireward in Addiction Behavior with Anatomically Specific Single-Cell Gene Expression Methods

Published on: August 4, 2022

2.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 25, 2026

Driving Under the Influence: How Music Listening Affects Driving Behaviors
07:25

Driving Under the Influence: How Music Listening Affects Driving Behaviors

Published on: March 27, 2019

13.0K
Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research
07:15

Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research

Published on: December 18, 2020

4.9K
Investigating Drivers of Antireward in Addiction Behavior with Anatomically Specific Single-Cell Gene Expression Methods
09:29

Investigating Drivers of Antireward in Addiction Behavior with Anatomically Specific Single-Cell Gene Expression Methods

Published on: August 4, 2022

2.6K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Traffic Safety Research
  • Behavioral Science

Background:

  • Dangerous driving behaviors pose significant public health risks.
  • Executive function deficits are implicated in various risky behaviors.
  • Understanding the cognitive underpinnings of dangerous driving is crucial for effective prevention.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the relationship between executive function and dangerous driving behaviors in college students.
  • To identify specific executive function deficits associated with distinct risky driving actions.
  • To explore the correlation between executive function, dangerous driving behaviors, and negative driving outcomes.

Main Methods:

  • A survey was administered to college students (N=136, ages 18-24) to assess executive function.
  • Participants were stratified into low and high executive function groups.
  • Dangerous driving behaviors (texting, no seat belt, intoxicated driving, speeding) and negative outcomes (crashes, tickets, being pulled over) were compared between groups and correlated with executive function subcategories.

Main Results:

  • Students with lower executive function reported higher engagement in dangerous driving behaviors and experienced more negative driving outcomes.
  • Texting while driving, driving while intoxicated, and speeding were strongly correlated with poor Impulse Control.
  • Driving without a seat belt was most strongly associated with deficits in Strategic Planning.

Conclusions:

  • Lower executive function is a significant risk factor for dangerous driving behaviors and outcomes in college students.
  • Specific dangerous driving behaviors are linked to distinct executive function deficits, particularly Impulse Control and Strategic Planning.
  • Interventions targeting specific cognitive processes may be necessary to effectively reduce different types of dangerous driving.