Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 25, 2026

Assessing Primary Motor Cortex Excitability and Excitability Modulation by Pairing Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation with Electromyography
Published on: October 7, 2025
Motor-cortex excitability and response variability following paired-associative stimulation: a proof-of-concept study
M Campana1,2, I Papazova1, B Pross1
1Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ludwig-Maximillian's-University of Munich, LMU, Nußbaumstr. 7, 80336, Munchen, Germany.
Individualized paired-associative stimulation (iPAS) may reduce response variability in transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) studies. This proof-of-concept study suggests iPAS, by accounting for individual conduction times, could decrease inter-individual differences in motor-evoked potentials (MEP).
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Neurophysiology
- Neuromodulation
Background:
- Paired-associative stimulation (PAS) shows variable efficacy and response across individuals.
- Current PAS protocols lack methods to mitigate inter-individual response variability.
- Understanding and reducing variability is crucial for reliable neuromodulation outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate if an individualized PAS (iPAS) paradigm can reduce response variability.
- To compare the effects of fixed inter-stimulus intervals (ISI) versus iPAS on motor-evoked potentials (MEP).
- To explore the impact of accounting for individual conduction times on PAS efficacy.
Main Methods:
- A within-subjects design with 21 participants assessed three PAS paradigms.
- Participants received fixed 25 ms (PAS 25) and 22 ms (PAS 22) ISI, and an individualized ISI (iPAS) protocol.
- Changes in transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)-elicited motor-evoked potentials (MEP) were measured post-stimulation.
Main Results:
- No significant increase in post-stimulation MEP magnitudes was observed across all tested PAS paradigms.
- Exploratory analysis indicated increased inter-individual variability with fixed ISI (PAS 25, PAS 22).
- The iPAS paradigm showed a trend towards higher rates of expected MEP magnitude increases and potentially lower inter-individual variability.
Conclusions:
- Findings suggest a potential association between individually tailored ISI (iPAS) and reduced inter-individual variability in PAS.
- The study highlights the challenge of intra-individual variability in PAS paradigms.
- Further large-scale, replicated studies are necessary to confirm these proof-of-concept findings.
Related Concept Videos
Somatosensory, Motor, and Association Cortex
Association Areas of the Cortex
Prefrontal Association Area: This area is located in the frontal lobe and is involved in planning, decision-making, and moderating social behavior. It connects with primary motor areas,...
Social Proof
Motor and Sensory Areas of the Cortex
Motor Areas
The motor areas located in the frontal lobe are central to controlling voluntary movements. This region is further subdivided into the primary motor cortex and the premotor cortex....
Motor Unit Stimulation
The latent period of contraction marks the onset of excitation-contraction coupling, when the action potential propagates across the sarcolemma, preparing the muscle fibers for contraction. As the fibers enter the contraction phase, the...
Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...

