Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Gas Chromatography: Introduction01:13

Gas Chromatography: Introduction

3.8K
Gas chromatography (GC) is a technique for separating and analyzing volatile compounds in a sample. Its primary purpose is to identify and quantify components in complex mixtures, making it essential in fields such as environmental analysis, pharmaceuticals, and petrochemicals. GC is also called vapor-phase chromatography (VPC) or gas-liquid partition chromatography (GLPC).
In GC,  a sample is vaporized and mixed with an inert carrier gas (the mobile phase), which transports it through a...
3.8K
Gas Chromatography: Overview of Detectors01:13

Gas Chromatography: Overview of Detectors

1.9K
Detectors in gas chromatography (GC) help identify and quantify the components of a mixture by translating chemical properties into measurable signals, which are displayed on a chromatogram. Detectors can be categorized into two main types: destructive and non-destructive.
A non-destructive detector allows a sample to be analyzed without altering or consuming it, meaning the sample can be collected after detection for further analysis. Examples include thermal conductivity detectors and...
1.9K
Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-II01:19

Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-II

1.1K
In gas chromatography, different detectors are employed to meet specific analytical needs. These detectors are often categorized based on their detection mechanisms and the types of compounds they are best suited to analyze. Thermal Conductivity Detectors (TCD), Flame Ionization Detectors (FID), and Electron Capture Detectors (ECD) represent common categories, each with unique operating principles and applications. However, beyond these, several other detectors are designed for more specialized...
1.1K
Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-I01:21

Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-I

1.5K
There are different types of detectors used in gas chromatography, each with its own specific properties that make it suitable for detecting certain types of analytes. The most commonly used detectors in GC are thermal conductivity detector (TCD), flame ionization detector (FID), and electron capture detector (ECD).
TCD is the earliest and most widely used detector that operates by measuring the changes in the thermal conductivity of the carrier gas. When a sample compound enters the detector,...
1.5K
Gas Chromatography: Sample Injection Systems01:08

Gas Chromatography: Sample Injection Systems

1.4K
In gas chromatography, the sample is introduced as a vapor plug into the carrier gas stream for high efficiency and resolution. A microsyringe injects the sample solution into a heated sample port, vaporizing it and mixing it with the carrier gas. This process is important to ensure the sample is properly prepared for analysis. Thermally sensitive samples can be injected directly into the column and volatilized by slowly increasing the column temperature.
Two primary injection methods are used...
1.4K
Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry (GC–MS)01:14

Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry (GC–MS)

6.6K
Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) is the combination of analytical techniques of gas chromatography and mass spectrometry in a single instrument for analyzing a mixture of compounds. The gas chromatograph separates the compounds in the mixture, and the mass spectrometer analyzes each compound separately to determine the molecular masses and molecular structures.
A gas chromatograph consists of a long, narrow capillary column with a polysiloxane coating on the inner wall....
6.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

National dialysis registry of the Dominican Republic: first nationwide epidemiological analysis of renal replacement therapy.

BMC nephrology·2026
Same author

Early Detection of Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema: Accuracy of Indocyanine Green Lymphography Compared with Bioimpedance Spectroscopy and Subclinical Lymphedema Symptoms.

Lymphatic research and biology·2023
Same author

Plasma Carboxylesterase 1 Predicts Methylphenidate Exposure: A Proof-of-Concept Study Using Plasma Protein Biomarker for Hepatic Drug Metabolism.

Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics·2021
Same author

Using Arterial Pressure Index to Predict Arterial Injuries in Penetrating Trauma to the Upper Extremities.

The American surgeon·2021
Same author

Drug Regimen Individualization for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: Guidance for Methylphenidate and Dexmethylphenidate Formulations.

Pharmacotherapy·2018
Same author

The Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Amphetamines Utilized in the Treatment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.

Journal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology·2017

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 25, 2026

Post Column Derivatization Using Reaction Flow High Performance Liquid Chromatography Columns
06:25

Post Column Derivatization Using Reaction Flow High Performance Liquid Chromatography Columns

Published on: April 26, 2016

15.8K

Potential for Underestimation of d-Methylphenidate Bioavailability Using Chiral Derivatization/Gas Chromatography.

Kennerly S Patrick1, Wendy Rodriguez2

  • 1Department of Drug Discovery and Biomedical Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina patrickk@musc.edu.

Drug Metabolism and Disposition: the Biological Fate of Chemicals
|April 28, 2019
PubMed
Summary

Older methods overestimated l-methylphenidate (MPH) bioavailability due to chiral impurities. Recent liquid chromatography shows d-MPH constitutes 99% of circulating MPH, making achiral analysis sufficient for most d-MPH quantitation.

More Related Videos

Nitrogen Compound Characterization in Fuels by Multidimensional Gas Chromatography
08:22

Nitrogen Compound Characterization in Fuels by Multidimensional Gas Chromatography

Published on: May 15, 2020

8.1K
A Micropatterning Assay for Measuring Cell Chirality
08:07

A Micropatterning Assay for Measuring Cell Chirality

Published on: March 11, 2022

2.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 25, 2026

Post Column Derivatization Using Reaction Flow High Performance Liquid Chromatography Columns
06:25

Post Column Derivatization Using Reaction Flow High Performance Liquid Chromatography Columns

Published on: April 26, 2016

15.8K
Nitrogen Compound Characterization in Fuels by Multidimensional Gas Chromatography
08:22

Nitrogen Compound Characterization in Fuels by Multidimensional Gas Chromatography

Published on: May 15, 2020

8.1K
A Micropatterning Assay for Measuring Cell Chirality
08:07

A Micropatterning Assay for Measuring Cell Chirality

Published on: March 11, 2022

2.7K

Area of Science:

  • Pharmacokinetics
  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Medicinal Chemistry

Background:

  • Discrepancies exist in methylphenidate (MPH) bioavailability data between older and newer analytical methods.
  • Older gas chromatography (GC) methods reported significant l-MPH presence, while newer chiral liquid chromatography (LC) methods indicate d-MPH dominance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explain the disparities in dl-MPH bioavailability data attributed to analytical methodology.
  • To clarify the accurate enantiomeric composition of MPH in circulation.

Main Methods:

  • Review and analysis of older chiral derivatization-gas chromatography (GC) methods.
  • Comparison with recent chiral liquid chromatography (LC) findings.
  • Hypothesizing the source of analytical error in older GC methods.

Main Results:

  • Older GC methods using S-prolyl derivatizing agents were susceptible to R-prolyl impurities, causing co-elution with l-MPH and overestimation of l-MPH.
  • Recent LC methods consistently demonstrate that approximately 99% of circulating MPH is the active d-enantiomer.
  • This suggests older methods significantly underestimated d-MPH bioavailability.

Conclusions:

  • The observed disparities in MPH bioavailability are likely due to imprecision in older chiral GC methods.
  • Achiral analysis of plasma MPH is generally sufficient for d-MPH quantitation due to its high circulating percentage.
  • Simultaneous monitoring of d-MPH and l-MPH may be necessary only in specific clinical or forensic scenarios involving altered metabolism or novel formulations.