Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Introduction to z Scores01:06

Introduction to z Scores

11.0K
A z score (or standardized value) is measured in units of the standard deviation. It tells you how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a zero z score. It is important to note that the mean of the z scores is zero, and the standard deviation is one.
z scores...
11.0K
Introduction to z Scores01:05

Introduction to z Scores

1.3K
A z score (or standardized value) is measured in units of the standard deviation. It indicates how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a zero z score. It is important to note that the mean of the z scores is zero, and the standard deviation is one.
z scores...
1.3K
z Scores and Area Under the Curve01:17

z Scores and Area Under the Curve

18.4K
z scores are the standardized values obtained after converting a normal distribution into a standard normal distribution. A z score is measured in units of the standard deviation. The z score tells you how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a z score of...
18.4K
Inertial Frames of Reference01:03

Inertial Frames of Reference

8.7K
Newton’s first law is usually considered to be a statement about reference frames. It provides a method for identifying a special type of reference frame: the inertial reference frame. In principle, we can make the net force on a body zero. If its velocity relative to a given frame is constant, then that frame is said to be inertial. So, by definition, an inertial reference frame is a reference frame where Newton's first law holds valid. Newton's first law applies to objects with...
8.7K
Non-inertial Frames of Reference01:27

Non-inertial Frames of Reference

7.1K
A reference frame accelerating or decelerating relative to an inertial frame is a non-inertial frame. To help understand this, consider what taking off in an airplane, turning a corner in a car, riding a merry-go-round, and the circular motion of a tropical cyclone all have in common. All these systems are accelerating, decelerating, or rotating relative to the Earth; hence, they all are non-inertial frames. All these systems exhibit inertial forces, which merely seem to arise from motion,...
7.1K
Chemical Shift: Internal References and Solvent Effects01:17

Chemical Shift: Internal References and Solvent Effects

1.3K
In an NMR sample, precise measurement of the absolute absorption frequencies of nuclei is difficult. A standard internal reference compound is added, and the frequency difference between the reference signal and sample signals is measured.
The internal reference compound generally used in NMR spectroscopy is tetramethylsilane (TMS). TMS is preferred because it is chemically inert, soluble in NMR solvents, and easily removable. Also, the highly shielded methyl protons in TMS yield an intense...
1.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

IQ-TREE 3: phylogenomic inference software using complex evolutionary models.

Molecular biology and evolution·2026
Same author

Gene tree discordance.

Current biology : CB·2026
Same author

Ancestry-specific performance of variant effect predictors in clinical variant classification.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Using gene trees with lineage-specific duplicates for phylogenetic inference mitigates the effects of long-branch attraction.

Systematic biology·2026
Same author

Reconsidering cytonuclear discordance in the genomic age.

Evolution; international journal of organic evolution·2025
Same author

Inconsistency of parsimony under the multispecies coalescent.

Theoretical population biology·2025
Same journal

Chromosome-scale genome assemblies of duckweeds provide insights into genomic plasticity, aquatic adaptation and morphological reduction.

Genome biology and evolution·2026
Same journal

Towards a functional genetics of adaptation: insights from microbial experimental evolution.

Genome biology and evolution·2026
Same journal

Evidence for cryptic sex in Escovopsis, a mycoparasite in the fungus-growing ant symbiosis.

Genome biology and evolution·2026
Same journal

Experimental evolution under biased sex ratios: phenotypic and genomic responses in the bulb mite, Rhizoglyphus robini.

Genome biology and evolution·2026
Same journal

Optimal organelle inheritance strategies under different changing environments and mutational pressures.

Genome biology and evolution·2026
Same journal

A reassessment of positive growth effects of expressed random sequence clones in E. coli suggests direct adaptive functions.

Genome biology and evolution·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 25, 2026

Simulation of a Scaled Assembly Process with Collaboration of a Robotic Arm and Monitoring through a Vision System for Quality Control
05:47

Simulation of a Scaled Assembly Process with Collaboration of a Robotic Arm and Monitoring through a Vision System for Quality Control

Published on: August 29, 2025

434

Referee: Reference Assembly Quality Scores.

Gregg W C Thomas1,2, Matthew W Hahn1,2

  • 1Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington.

Genome Biology and Evolution
|April 28, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

New software, Referee, assesses the quality of genome assemblies. It annotates haploid sequences with position-specific quality scores, improving downstream analysis accuracy for genomic research.

Keywords:
bioinformaticsgenomicsquality scores

More Related Videos

Implementation of a Reference Interferometer for Nanodetection
16:11

Implementation of a Reference Interferometer for Nanodetection

Published on: April 26, 2014

9.8K
Preparation of High-Quality Fermented Fish Product
05:17

Preparation of High-Quality Fermented Fish Product

Published on: August 23, 2019

11.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 25, 2026

Simulation of a Scaled Assembly Process with Collaboration of a Robotic Arm and Monitoring through a Vision System for Quality Control
05:47

Simulation of a Scaled Assembly Process with Collaboration of a Robotic Arm and Monitoring through a Vision System for Quality Control

Published on: August 29, 2025

434
Implementation of a Reference Interferometer for Nanodetection
16:11

Implementation of a Reference Interferometer for Nanodetection

Published on: April 26, 2014

9.8K
Preparation of High-Quality Fermented Fish Product
05:17

Preparation of High-Quality Fermented Fish Product

Published on: August 23, 2019

11.0K

Area of Science:

  • Genomics and Bioinformatics
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is crucial for biological research, but sequencing and assembly errors are common.
  • Errors in genome assemblies can compromise downstream analyses and research conclusions.
  • Current haploid reference assemblies lack comprehensive per-position quality assessment, unlike diploid genotype data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce Referee, a novel program for assessing the quality of haploid genome assemblies.
  • To provide a succinct, per-position quality score for every site in a haploid assembly.
  • To facilitate the filtering of low-quality genomic data and improve downstream analysis reliability.

Main Methods:

  • Referee utilizes diploid genotype quality information to annotate haploid assemblies.
  • It assigns a quality score on a Phred-like scale to each position.
  • Outputs are generated in FASTQ format for easy filtering and BED format for genome browser visualization.

Main Results:

  • Referee successfully annotates haploid assemblies with per-position quality scores.
  • The generated scores enable straightforward identification and filtering of low-quality genomic regions.
  • Outputs are compatible with standard bioinformatics tools and visualization platforms.

Conclusions:

  • Referee provides essential quality assessment for haploid genome assemblies.
  • This tool enhances the reliability of genomic research by enabling precise data filtering.
  • Referee is freely available, promoting wider adoption and improved genomic data quality.