Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 25, 2026

Swabbing the Urban Environment - A Pipeline for Sampling and Detection of SARS-CoV-2 From Environmental Reservoirs
Published on: April 9, 2021
Operationalizing the feedback between institutional decision-making, socio-political infrastructure, and
Andres Baeza1, Luis A Bojorquez-Tapia2, Marco A Janssen3
1School of Sustainability, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA; Julie Ann Wrigley Global Institute of Sustainability, Arizona State University, Arizona, USA.
Urban adaptation to climate change requires understanding how institutional decisions shape vulnerability to hazards like flooding. This study models decision-making to reveal socio-political impacts on urban vulnerability, aiding better planning.
Area of Science:
- Urban planning and climate adaptation science.
- Socio-hydrology and environmental governance.
- Spatial vulnerability assessment.
Background:
- Urban adaptation to climate change is driven by responses to hazards like flooding and water scarcity.
- Institutional and collective decisions, influenced by political and cultural factors, shape these responses and future vulnerabilities.
- Understanding the legacy of infrastructure investments and decision-making is crucial for vulnerability assessments.
Purpose of the Study:
- To present a novel modeling framework for exploring institutional decision-making and socio-political processes.
- To analyze the resultant effects of these processes on spatial patterns of urban vulnerability.
- To operationalize the framework with a case study on water governance in Mexico City.
Main Methods:
- Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA).
- Agent-based modeling (ABM).
- Geographic information system (GIS) simulation.
Main Results:
- The framework allows exploration of uncertainties, spatial patterns, and thresholds in vulnerability outcomes.
- Policy scenarios demonstrate sensitivities of vulnerability to different decision-making approaches.
- The Mexico City example operationalizes the framework for sociohydrological risk analysis.
Conclusions:
- Modeling institutional decision-making is vital for understanding and managing urban vulnerability.
- The framework provides a tool for empirically implementing sociohydrological risk assessments in urban environments.
- This approach can inform policy and planning for more resilient urban futures.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Feedback Inhibition
Feedback Loops
Effects of feedback
Feedback significantly modifies the gain of a control system. The gain of a system without feedback is altered by a factor of one plus GH, where G represents...
Feedback control systems
Linear feedback systems are theoretical models that simplify analysis and design. These systems operate under the principle that their output is directly proportional to their input within certain ranges. For instance, an amplifier in a control system behaves linearly as long as the input signal remains within a specific range. However, most physical systems exhibit inherent nonlinearity...
Facial Feedback Hypothesis
Decision Making
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...

