Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 25, 2026

Setting Up a Stroke Team Algorithm and Conducting Simulation-based Training in the Emergency Department - A Practical Guide
Published on: January 15, 2017
Geriatric patients on antithrombotic therapy as a criterion for trauma team activation leads to over triage
Zachary M Callahan1, Stephen P Gadomski1, Deepika Koganti1
1Division of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, 1015 Walnut St, Curtis Building Suite 620, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
Insights
New trauma activation criteria for elderly patients on antithrombotic medication increased trauma activations and reduced undertriage, with no significant change in mortality. This policy aimed to improve care for high-risk head trauma patients.
Area of Science:
- Trauma surgery
- Geriatric emergency medicine
- Public health policy
Background:
- Institutions amended trauma activation criteria for geriatric patients (≥65 years) on antithrombotic medication with suspected head trauma.
- A Level II trauma activation was mandated for this specific high-risk demographic.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of revised trauma activation criteria on patient management and outcomes.
- To assess changes in overtriage and undertriage rates following the policy change.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective review of the institutional trauma registry was conducted.
- Geriatric patients on antithrombotic medication presenting with head trauma were analyzed before and after the criteria amendment.
- Demographics, presentation, activation level, and outcomes were compared between the two groups.
Main Results:
- Trauma activation rates significantly increased post-policy change (19.9% vs. 74.9%).
- Overtriage, indicated by direct discharge home without injury, also increased (4.3% vs. 44%).
- Undertriage decreased, with fewer patients experiencing critical outcomes or traumatic intracranial hemorrhage without activation (65.1% vs. 23.5% and 70.7% vs. 27.3%, respectively).
- Mortality rates remained unchanged (4.3% vs. 2.0%).
Conclusions:
- The revised trauma activation criteria effectively reduced undertriage in high-risk geriatric patients.
- The policy led to increased overtriage but had minimal impact on overall mortality.
- These findings highlight the trade-offs between overtriage and undertriage when modifying trauma activation protocols.
Background:
Our institution amended its trauma activation criteria to require a Level II activation for patients ≥65 years old on antithrombotic medication presenting with suspected head trauma.
Methods:
Our institutional trauma registry was queried for geriatric patients on antithrombotic medication in the year before and after this criteria change. Demographics, presentation metrics, level of activation, and outcomes were compared between groups.
Results:
After policy change, a greater proportion of patients received a trauma activation (19.9 vs. 74.9%, P < 0.001) and a greater proportion of these patients were discharged directly home without injury (4.3 vs. 44%, P < 0.001). However, a smaller proportion of patients with a critical Emergency Department disposition or traumatic intracranial hemorrhage failed to receive a trauma activation (65.1 vs. 23.5%, P < 0.001; 70.7% vs. 27.3%, P < 0.001). There was no change in mortality (4.3 vs. 2.0%, P = 0.21).
Conclusions:
Implementing new criteria increased overtriage, decreased undertriage, and had little effect on mortality.
Related Concept Videos
Drug Dosing: Geriatric Patients
Pharmacodynamics in Geriatric Patients: Effects of Age
Pharmacokinetics in Geriatric Patients: Effect of Age on Drug Distribution
Pharmacokinetics in Geriatric Patients: Effect of Age on Drug Metabolism
Pharmacokinetics in Geriatric Patients: Effect of Age on Drug Excretion
Pharmacokinetics in Geriatric Patients: Effect of Age on Drug Absorption

