Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

8.1K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
8.1K
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

4.2K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
4.2K
Bias01:22

Bias

7.3K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
7.3K
Diode: Forward bias01:20

Diode: Forward bias

2.1K
In semiconductor devices, diodes play a crucial role in directing current flow, and its operation is primarily categorized into forward bias and reverse bias. A diode is said to be forward-biased when its p-type region is connected to the positive terminal of a battery and its n-type region is linked to the negative terminal. This configuration reduces the potential barrier within the diode, allowing current to flow easily from the p to the n-type region.
The behavior of a diode in forward bias...
2.1K
Biasing of FET01:22

Biasing of FET

694
Biasing a Junction Field Effect Transistor (JFET) is crucial for setting operational parameters and ensuring efficient functioning in electronic circuits. JFETs are characterized by using a single carrier type in N-channel or P-channel configurations, where the channel is surrounded by PN junctions. These junctions are central to the device's ability to control current flow.
In an N-channel JFET, the structure consists of N-type material forming the channel on a P-type substrate, with the...
694
Biasing of P-N Junction01:16

Biasing of P-N Junction

1.9K
The operation of a p-n junction diode involves various biasing conditions, including forward bias, reverse bias, and equilibrium.
In equilibrium, no external voltage is applied across the p-n junction. The depletion region is formed at the junction interface due to the diffusion of carriers, which leaves behind charged dopants, acceptors on the p-side, and donors on the n-side. These immobile charges create an electric field that prevents further diffusion of carriers. The related energy band...
1.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evaluating Frailty Index Integrity: Insights from an International Network Study.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

The Mediating Role of Frailty in Healthcare Utilization Among Sexual and Gender Minorities: A Comparison of Generalist, Specialist, and Mental Health Visits.

Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society·2026
Same author

BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness in pregnancy: Emulating trial NCT04754594 using observational data from Norwegian health registries.

Vaccine·2025
Same author

Identifiability and Interpretation of Estimands Under Selection in Perinatal Research.

Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology·2025
Same author

Characterizing the Role of Neighborhood Disadvantage in a Digital PrEP Intervention for Young Sexual and Gender Minority Men.

AIDS and behavior·2025
Same author

Initiation of Antiseizure Medications in Patients With Brain Abscess.

JAMA network open·2025
Same journal

Can the All of Us sample be reweighted to mirror a nationally representative sample? A comparison of mortality predictors.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Gut health, systemic inflammation, and linear growth among Indonesian infants: findings from the Action Against Stunting Hub observation cohort: Erratum.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Evaluating Estimators in Partially Identified Models.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Stratification and accumulation? Explaining changing mortality inequities between business owners and non-owners in the U.S. (1984-2022).

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Be wary of age-stratum aging in early-onset cancer trends.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

The Authors Respond.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 25, 2026

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task
12:10

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task

Published on: March 4, 2022

3.1K

Bounding Bias Due to Selection.

Louisa H Smith1, Tyler J VanderWeele1,2

  • 1From theDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)
|April 30, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Selection bias can impact epidemiologic studies, but this research provides simple bounds to quantify its potential magnitude. These methods help researchers assess how selection bias might affect study results and causal inference.

More Related Videos

Post-Movie Subliminal Measurement PMSM, for Investigating Implicit Social Bias
09:03

Post-Movie Subliminal Measurement PMSM, for Investigating Implicit Social Bias

Published on: February 29, 2020

6.3K
Synthesis of Substrate-Bound Au Nanowires Via an Active Surface Growth Mechanism
09:36

Synthesis of Substrate-Bound Au Nanowires Via an Active Surface Growth Mechanism

Published on: July 18, 2018

8.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 25, 2026

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task
12:10

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task

Published on: March 4, 2022

3.1K
Post-Movie Subliminal Measurement PMSM, for Investigating Implicit Social Bias
09:03

Post-Movie Subliminal Measurement PMSM, for Investigating Implicit Social Bias

Published on: February 29, 2020

6.3K
Synthesis of Substrate-Bound Au Nanowires Via an Active Surface Growth Mechanism
09:36

Synthesis of Substrate-Bound Au Nanowires Via an Active Surface Growth Mechanism

Published on: July 18, 2018

8.3K

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics
  • Causal Inference

Background:

  • Selection bias poses a significant threat to the validity of causal inference in epidemiologic studies conducted on population subsets.
  • Quantifying selection bias and performing sensitivity analyses are often complex and challenging for researchers.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop simple, bounded expressions for quantifying the magnitude of selection bias.
  • To provide researchers with practical tools for assessing the potential impact of selection bias on study findings.

Main Methods:

  • Demonstrated bounding of selection bias magnitude using simple expressions based on unmeasured factors and measured variables.
  • Introduced summary measures derived from bounds to calculate the minimum bias magnitude needed to nullify a risk ratio.
  • Illustrated the application of these methods with examples of varying selection mechanisms.

Main Results:

  • Developed simple, assumption-free expressions to bound the magnitude of selection bias.
  • Created summary measures to determine the strength of selection bias required to explain away observed results.
  • Showcased the practical implementation of these sensitivity analyses through diverse examples.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed bounding methods offer a straightforward approach to quantify and assess selection bias in epidemiologic research.
  • These tools empower researchers to better understand the robustness of their findings against potential selection bias.
  • The methods are adaptable and can be simplified under specific assumptions or contexts, enhancing their utility.